Yeah, I like it. It’s definitely an unfinished product and lacking a lot of content and polish atm, but it’s got the bones of a good game. Absolutely not worth the current asking price tho
Honestly that’s just how Civ has been for the past few releases, most people don’t get it until the typical set of 2 major expansion packs come out and eventually go on sale. The base price of the full package has always been crazy high.
You can play Unciv I guess, I don’t see why you would want a strategic view only though? Nothing stopping you just using that mode exclusively yourself.
I played through exactly one full game, and it just felt… pointless, I guess? Like I was just clicking through turns to get to the end and none of it mattered. Then it told me I’d lost and was like “K” and then played Civ VI for a bit.
I mean why play an unfinished game? The radical changes sound interesting to me but it needs at least two add-ons to flourish, the same old story as with 5 and 6. I can wait and pick up the complete experience for half the price if that ever sees the light of day after the layoffs.
I listened. I bought Civ6, hated it, didn’t get any of the predatory DLC and went back to Civ4. Didn’t give Civ7 so much as a glance. Sad to hear it went downhill from 6 though.
They are basically gig workers like in the film industry. This was always the case with QA jobs and low ranking artists, but nowadays it also happens to the other roles in a development project.
I don’t buy civ games until they release all the DLC. Since CIV 5 it seems like they have released unfinished games that lack major game mechanics on launch and the game only gets finished through DLC.
Poor adoption and sales with CIV 7 is their own fault. They have conditioned the market to wait for the DLC.
I think every downturn in gaming history has led to explosions in indie dev studios and products.
this one feels a bit different; first time I’ve seen companies posting record profits and bragging about them, while laying devs off in absolute droves. it’s almost as if consolidating a billion competing IPs into a handful of publisher/owners who don’t really care about games per se, but see the enormous financial value in controlling the IP and production landscapes may have been a bad idea.
don’t get me wrong, someone comes along and offers me billions for my company, probably gonna take it, but you can see how it becomes reductive; and then the people calling the shots end up knowing very little about the actual mechanics of the industry… yeah we’re in for very fun times.
Indies will keep producing great stuff. Some of them will also get gobbled up. Support the rest please!
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Rules
1. Submissions have to be related to games
Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.
This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.
2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil
No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.
We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.
3. No excessive self-promotion
Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.
This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.
4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you’re submitting before posting to see if it’s already been posted.
We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.
5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW
Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.
No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.
6. No linking to piracy
Don’t share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.
We don’t want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.
Guess that means no “play by cloud” mode 😢
Anyone actually playing 7? I know of no one personally, and I’ve played them all religiously
It shipped with Denuvo and I don’t pay for malware. It’s the first Civ game I haven’t bought at launch. I’m including the original.
It doesn’t have Hot Seat either. I instantly refunded when I realized that. How the hell a Civ game have multiplayer but not hot seat?
Might it get added later, hopefully?
I don’t buy promises anymore, sorry.
Yeah, I like it. It’s definitely an unfinished product and lacking a lot of content and polish atm, but it’s got the bones of a good game. Absolutely not worth the current asking price tho
Honestly that’s just how Civ has been for the past few releases, most people don’t get it until the typical set of 2 major expansion packs come out and eventually go on sale. The base price of the full package has always been crazy high.
We will see. 'Cause for all Civ 6’s (and every Civ’s) controversy, this feels different… It’s like people have forgotten about 7.
That’s about as expected. As a big fan of civ, it just looked like a worse version of 6, which was a worse version of 5.
Only reason for the bigger playercount of 6 is because of Sean Bean’s incredible narration.
I bet proportionally more DRM-free buyers play 5 and 4 too.
deleted by creator
Just want a version that is strategic-view only
You can play Unciv I guess, I don’t see why you would want a strategic view only though? Nothing stopping you just using that mode exclusively yourself.
It’s because my computer is old
I think you can enable it as the default mode and then it will load the game quicker? Definitely checkout Unciv though if you haven’t already!
UnCiv is honestly wicked, it deserves a lot more limelight than it gets
Well they removed the ability to play as “A civilization” in the game called “Civilization” so yeah everyone I know has swore off it.
It still amazes me they took the worst feature from Humankind and somehow made it worse.
Yes and no. If you want to play China you can play as the various chinese incarnations from beginning to end.
It only works with China for some mysterious reason though.
Nah, 4 is still the best.
Beyond the Sword with Leonard Nemoy narrating of course.
There are also a bunch of mods, including the total conversion ones.
Nah, 5 is still the goat.
Yeah they lost me on 6 and 7 looks to go even further in that direction
I played through exactly one full game, and it just felt… pointless, I guess? Like I was just clicking through turns to get to the end and none of it mattered. Then it told me I’d lost and was like “K” and then played Civ VI for a bit.
I gave up after the 20th bug I encountered. (Yes I kept track.)
Nah, I didn’t even bother. I only play 5 & 6.
I mean why play an unfinished game? The radical changes sound interesting to me but it needs at least two add-ons to flourish, the same old story as with 5 and 6. I can wait and pick up the complete experience for half the price if that ever sees the light of day after the layoffs.
Nah, 2 was the series peak.
Naw, 1 was the GOAT. The full game, no DLC, one price.
deleted by creator
Naw, 5 and 6 are where it is at.
Stop supporting 2K shit.
I’ve been saying this for years. And nobody listens.
I listened. I bought Civ6, hated it, didn’t get any of the predatory DLC and went back to Civ4. Didn’t give Civ7 so much as a glance. Sad to hear it went downhill from 6 though.
Yup, without Luigi there to kill the bugs it’s been pretty tough I suppose.
I think some of the DLC is what made Civ6 eventually tolerable. But that’s already a bad sign.
It is a Civ tradition, BotS made Civ4 amazing, but I’d argue the base game was solid and just needed some mechanical polish.
This. Fuck 2K Games, quit buying their shitty EA level titles and move on.
I have a friend who was laid off from there today. Definitely feel bad for them.
Game devs really have to keep their CVs ready at anytime given how uncertain their jobs are.
They are basically gig workers like in the film industry. This was always the case with QA jobs and low ranking artists, but nowadays it also happens to the other roles in a development project.
“It was just Terry because he kept stealing pens from the supply closet for his own personal use.”
20 years ago I had a boss that always held his pens in his mouth.
So one day, when I was the only guy in the office, I took all his pens, and one by one stuck them up my butt.
Then I put them back in his cup.
What did your boss do to deserve this?
I mean, what specifically?
He held his pen in his mouth 🤬🤬
are you familiar with ass pennies?
ALL OF YOU! EACH ONE OF YOU HAS HAD MY FILTHY ASS PENNIES!
Bender bit a poo penny!
Wtf
username checks out
C levels need to free up cash for their holiday bonuses
I don’t buy civ games until they release all the DLC. Since CIV 5 it seems like they have released unfinished games that lack major game mechanics on launch and the game only gets finished through DLC.
Poor adoption and sales with CIV 7 is their own fault. They have conditioned the market to wait for the DLC.
Firaxis are like the Bethesda of turn based strategy games. They release buggy jank and expect modders to fix it.
If you’re a game developer, it’s probably best to avoid big devs. Go indie instead.
I think every downturn in gaming history has led to explosions in indie dev studios and products.
this one feels a bit different; first time I’ve seen companies posting record profits and bragging about them, while laying devs off in absolute droves. it’s almost as if consolidating a billion competing IPs into a handful of publisher/owners who don’t really care about games per se, but see the enormous financial value in controlling the IP and production landscapes may have been a bad idea.
don’t get me wrong, someone comes along and offers me billions for my company, probably gonna take it, but you can see how it becomes reductive; and then the people calling the shots end up knowing very little about the actual mechanics of the industry… yeah we’re in for very fun times.
Indies will keep producing great stuff. Some of them will also get gobbled up. Support the rest please!
They must have built a mine over a monument
deleted by creator