
Im allowed to express my opinion on a topic or someone as much as anyone is. If you dont like that, you dont have to engage with it. If someone disagrees with me or calls me an asshole, that’s fine, I’ll take their opinion onboard, but I wont lose sleep over it.
Hounding someone would be commenting about them in every location possible, which I am not doing. If multiple people share my opinion and have posted it elsewhere, thats also not hounding.

It’s always the extreme comparisons…
You must simply sit in an empty space and do nothing in order to avoid links to some disgusting actions or morals. You arent stupid, you know that.
I avoid GitHub as much as I can, but you know it’s impossible to completely avoid it while still using many FOSS projects. But lets see, if I visit GitHub to download a project, I am only using up their bandwidth, costing Microsoft money, not giving them any. Youll argue the clicks increases their popularity and thats worth more etc and on and on…
Hardware… yes of course… the food you eat… yes… its pointless comparisons. A classic argument technique though.
The talking point is AI and I avoid AI as much as I can.

Lmao. I have nothing but respect for FOSS projects and have donated plenty of money to many.
What I am not supporting is the use the of AI, if they want to, then they can, I will just stop using their project.
Yes, you are an asshole if you dont disclose it and the comments I’ve seen from him just cements that for me more.
AI can fuck off, we havent needed it for decades and decades, we dont need it now.

These AI people are so delusional. They contradict themselves immediately.
But I have over 30 years of programming experience
Then you don’t need AI.
In many ways, it couldn’t have been implemented in a worse way but it was AI that bought all the RAM, it was OpenAI. It was not AI that stole copyrighted content, it was Facebook. It wasn’t AI that laid off thousands of employees, it’s deluded executives who don’t understand that this tool is an augmentation, not a replacement for humans.
??? The common denominator is AI. By using it you are part of the problem. All mainstream AI is trained on stolen data.
I’m not a big fan of having to pay a monthly sub to Anthropic, I don’t like depending on cloud services.
Then don’t?
There are massive issues with AI tech, but those are caused by our current capitalist culture, not the tools themselves.
The “tools” require large amounts of storage, RAM, electricity, water etc etc. The only tool is the end user.
Anyway, I was suspecting that this “issue” might come up so I’ve removed the Claude co-authorship from the commits a few days ago. So good luck figuring out what’s generated and what is not.
So they are just an asshole and their excuse finding is just irrelevant.

It’s not free to play because they are being generous. It’s because it enables the most exposure to the most predatory model.
Would they have made the same amount of money with a paid game? Probably not, most free to play games know they arent interesting enough to sell like that.
Selling the game after the fact is just gross, not them being nice. The trend that needs to start is any online games just being playable offline from the start, or for free in the end.
Or we wait for legislation to hopefully force this, without any extra purchases needed.

Unless you are buying DRM-free, ownership isn’t implied for any game. They don’t need the money to make the game playable offline, that work has already been done, charging for it is just trying to get one last cashout.
Hey that game you’ve been playing all this time, them purchases you’ve made, well if you want to keep playing, you have to pay us!

No. They can’t prey on people with “micro”-transactions and then ask for money to get a game that should have been playable offline anyway. That’s abusing the live service, free-to-play model for as long as it benefits them and then also asking for the price of a game afterwards. Let’s not let them set a precedent here.

We know, but the one good thing AI has done is help bring these other issues to light.
However, having no supply of hardware because it’s all been “preordered” is a much larger issue than scalpers.
Some companies have protections against scalping, some dont care, but the biggest issue there is people buying the “scalped” products. They just cant help themselves.
Developers are forming more unions, its picking up pace, so there’s hope there. It’s also partly a customer issue too, buy and support the games made ethically.

It’s hard to get away from consolidation. I see things like Stoat getting popular, though it looks like development slowed down?
Teamspeak works fine, most use Discord as a voice and quick text app rather than a social network anyway. And honestly the whole “forum” aspect of Discord needs to rot anyway, perhaps this would stop companies relying on Discord as their news and support outlet, because fuck that.

Yeah, I mean I still give them a go, but ultimately I think first person is better suited to shooters.
If Division 3 has a beta or whatever, I will probably try it too regardless. If the game is good enough even with TPS, then that would be great. I doubt it will be anything remarkable though, given Ubisoft’s implosion.

Well yeah that’s the thing though, you are filling in the blanks. I can’t remember all the marketing material, I think they did cut a lot of the map though.
Even if they did manage to make it expansive and interesting enough, the third person would ruin it for me. It was clearly made with slow camera movement of controllers in mind.
Hi Jensen!