$70 games ‘will go the way of the dodo’, believes Saber CEO | VGC
www.videogameschronicle.com
external-link
The former interim Embracer COO believes developers will move to reduce risk and costs…
@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
3210M

He told IGN that one of its upcoming titles, Space Marine 2, will retail for $70, but only because he’s concerned audiences would see a cheaper price as emblematic of poor quality.

Yipes. Saber should throw this minnow back in the water and cast that line out again for a bigger fish that knows anything about the videogame market.

When I see a $70 game my very first thought is an over-promised under-delivered mess barely beta quality that contains Denuvo or some other shitware that had higher priority to work at launch than the game itself. Not to mention a day one patch the size of the entire install, login servers that can’t handle the load, graphical glitches, and constant framerate drops.

That $30 game is $70 because it’s a hot genre and other no name shops a fraction of the size sold a million copies at $30 so this exec’s massive studio with its executive team’s millions of combined man-hours could sell it for $150 and gamers would buy it because the reputation alone is worth $100 per copy according to them.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
1010M

man that’s some dumb reasoning in an attempt to justify a $70 price tag. Just cause a games expensive doesn’t make it automatic quality.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
310M

It may be dumb but it’s been a proven concept repeatedly. Apple proves this every day. Designer clothes prove this.

FiveMacs
link
fedilink
English
3710M

70$ games don’t even exist in my eyes. Anyone who asks 70+, will ask for more right away. It’s just greed

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
310M

Dragons Dogma 2 sure did. I think they had about $40 of DLC ready day one. Same for Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
410M

I’m happy to pay it if the game is worth $70, but with games releasing in such a buggy state, they’re not worth anywhere close to that. I don’t care about FUD and am hurting for games to play, so the value is a given game to me is much lower.

So I wait until they’re solid, and they’re usually much cheaper by then. I’d like to pay Cities: Skylines 2, but the performance and content aren’t there. That’s a game I’d totally pay launch price for, but the quality isn’t there.

I have limited gaming time, so I’m not going to spend it playing new releases with tons of bugs. I paid for new releases as a kid because games actually launched in a finished state. Games these days don’t, so I don’t buy them.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
510M

I can’t think of a single recent game that I would consider to be worth $70.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
110M

The funny one to me is Microsoft. Starfield and Redfall? $70. Hi-Fi Rush, Pentiment, and Hellblade II? Cheaper than that. They’re telling people that they think quantity is worth more than quality.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
410M

Maybe BG3, but that’s about it honestly.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
310M

That was the recent game that came to mind, spent 60 hours on my current playthrough and only starting act 2 (of 3 for those that aren’t familiar). It’s such a well done game, I’ll gladly buy Larian games full price until their quality drops.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
910M

They’re getting rid of the shareholders?

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
410M

What risk? FIFA, MADDEN etc get sequel after sequel, the only real risk is them trying to make shitty live service games to make a quick buck then inevitably giving up on it after it predictably fails.

Hypx
link
fedilink
2210M

Yes. And it will be replaced by $80-100 games.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
210M

Don’t forget the heap of micro transactions thrown in!

Dizzy Devil Ducky
link
fedilink
English
410M

Hey, pass me some of that copium so I can be that delusionally optimistic!

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
410M

IMO the issue is the fixation around a standard price point. The price should be correlated to the value a game offers.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
-20
edit-2
10M

‘The way of the dodo’ the fuck does that mean? 🤔

Go extinct. Like the dodo bird.

I don’t share this dude’s optimism though. I agree $70 games will cease to exist… But only because they’ll go up to $80.

https://youtu.be/30hvJqFdH5o?si=SWjSI_vMt5r5H2gD

It was a common phrase about 25 years ago.

Back when animals going extinct was more novel and shocking.

@[email protected]
bot account
link
fedilink
English
110M

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/30hvJqFdH5o?si=SWjSI_vMt5r5H2gD

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
810M

So going the way of the dodo has… Gone the way of the dodo?

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
110M

🤔

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
2310M

So, make good games for lower price, where the graphics is secondary, is the way to go? Who would’ve guessed! Thing is, it’s easier for suits to push all the money into graphics, than attracting and keeping passioned developers and iterate on a good concept. Hire and fire is easier for them.

It’s about time they fall on the nose. Give me mid sized games, for lower price and release good expansion DLC. That does reduce the risk for publisher and ultimately gives more control to players as well. But it might not hit the next sales world record and so on paper it looks worse to them.

But hey, indie devs have gladly filled that hole.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
410M

But then how could poor Nvidia ever hope to sell any more gpus waaaay above MSRP??

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
210M

Hearts in the right place but nVidia are the ones who set Manufacturers Suggested Retail Price, as they are the creator of the item (I think technically they’re LSRP cuz they license the tech but same idea)

They just set it stupidly fucking high for a laugh

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
5510M

I would never pay that much for a game. I just wait a couple of years and buy them when they go on sale for under $20. I’m not going to pay a premium just to be a beta tester.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
1610M

For context, here’s what prices ran for NES games:

https://www.33rdsquare.com/how-much-did-the-nintendo-entertainment-system-cost-in-1986/

Here were some of the most popular titles and their prices in the mid-1980s:

  • Super Mario Bros – $40-50
  • The Legend of Zelda – $45 when new
  • Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles – $42 initial price
  • Metroid – $35 at launch
  • Kirby‘s Adventure – $39.99 original MSRP

I’m going to adjust for inflation to 2024:

https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/

  • Super Mario Bros - $115.36-$144.20
  • The Legend of Zelda - $129.78
  • Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles - $121.13
  • Metroid - $100.94
  • Kirby’s Adventure - $115.33
@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
310M

Yes when they actually had to sell real things and not just a digital download. They also had to actually publish fully finished games as game updates were basically impossible.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
910M

For context, here’s what prices ran for NES games

For another context: That was the time regular children got max 4 games per year and it was a momentous occasion. Games getting cheaper through CD-ROM (move away from cartriges) and inflation is the reason the customer base grew.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
6
edit-2
10M

Compared to the market for games back then to now. Was the game industry bigger than movies and music combined?

Is gaming a niche now as it was back then?

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
2910M

Comparing prices directly like this is almost irrelevant imo. And doesn’t really dictate what the price of games should be.

Reasons old games should be pricier:

  • Hardware involved (cartridges/electronics).
  • Total number of customers were smaller, you have to subsidize development with less total sales.

Reasons why new games should be pricier:

  • Development has inflated to hundreds of people and multiple years (instead of dozens of people and multiple months)

But at the end of the day, business just price what the market will bear. It’s only indirectly related to the cost of production. The margins on some games are insanely high compared to others.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
1010M

Don’t forget distribution. It costs money to make a nice cartridge. It costs money to stamp a CD and put it in a pretty box. And that cost applies for every. single. copy.

Now compare that to digital distribution…

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
510M

Yeah and you could buy a house for 20k back then and that same house is 1.7 million now. So it’s almost like people had more disposable income back then. Half of all Americans make less than 35k a year so that $70 price would be like if games back then cost $600.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
3210M

A large portion of the cost of those games was the mask ROM that had to be manufactured for each release.

There was no patches or updates. If there was an issue, then your very expensive mask is trash and a new one has to be made, which also significantly delays the release. The games had to be released in a finished and fully working state. A lot more work had to go into testing before release.

Development for old consoles was also much harder. You had to write very well optimized code to get it to run on the limited hardware that was available.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
-210M

You could argue that cloud servers are a cost like a cartridge. A stupid forced cost.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
610M

It’s a cost that wouldn’t be needed if they would let us host our own servers.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
310M

It’s so infuriating

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
2810M

There was also a smaller market since video games were new. So higher costs, lower sales leads to higher prices.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
1810M

$70 games will go the way of the Dodo, not because $60 games will signal their demise, but because $80 games with seasonally expiring battlepasses and subscription based non-ownership models will.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
110M

Sad reality and one day our kids will watch some documentary and wonder how it was possible we were all owning those bloody games back then

THCDenton
link
fedilink
English
510M

I am buying space marine when it’s the price of a sandwich

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
110M

Airport sandwich or deli sandwich?

THCDenton
link
fedilink
English
310M

gas station sandwich

Create a post

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc…
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

  • 1 user online
  • 84 users / day
  • 255 users / week
  • 1.11K users / month
  • 3.93K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 12.6K Posts
  • 88K Comments
  • Modlog