Ubisoft claims consumers were given "clear and conspicuous" notice that they were only buying a "limited license" to access the game.
Psychadelligoat
link
fedilink
English
33M

Every time I see a thumbnail for this game it gets me excited for a new Driver game because that’s what The Crew is

Fuck Ubisoft for many reasons, not least of which making The Crew out of Driver: SF’s follow-up

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
53M

Don’t buy Ubisoft

DebatableRaccoon
link
fedilink
English
273M

Well, since they don’t sell games, I guess they shouldn’t expect to see any of my money anytime soon. The blade cuts both ways, Ubishit, you can’t have your cake and eat it too.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
673M

If buying isn’t ownership, then piracy isn’t theft.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
9
edit-2
3M

https://stopkillinggames.com

Target your anger about this to something productive.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
8
edit-2
3M

We should really make laws that protect consumers and makes it so game services that are shut down become opensource.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
173M

Never give Ubi money. Or EA. Or Blizzard.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
13M

Or any game company. This has been the norm for decades, probably since the first piece of software was sold.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
23M

I unfortunately had to buy “A Way Out” and “It Takes Two” to play it with my spouse. I’m sorry.

But I installed the “Fck EA App” with great pleasure (https://github.com/p0358/Fuck_off_EA_App).

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
173M

Wouldn’t the easiest way out for this just be to throw a repo up and say “host your own servers, go away.”

It feels like that would be an approach that would be simple and cheap to deliver (they don’t have to handhold any of it) but makes them look magnamanous-- “you’ll be able to show your kids this game or get a nostalgia kick even 20 years for now, like how your dad pulled out the Atari 2600”.

lime!
link
fedilink
English
103M

that’s what the other side wants them to do, yes.

servers are probably to tightly integrated into ubi’s infra to publish but they don’t want to say that.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
23M

I figure it would be the “good enough compliance gesture” like when router makers dunp a barely-building code sample to comply with the GPL.

Cruxifux
link
fedilink
English
53M

Ubisoft about to play a game of Luigi’s Mansion

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
23M

Ubisoft, more like Poopysoft am I right

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
13M

If your poop isn’t soft, you need to drink more water.

Create a post

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
  • 1 user online
  • 45 users / day
  • 177 users / week
  • 819 users / month
  • 3.27K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 5.87K Posts
  • 40.7K Comments
  • Modlog