Ubisoft claims consumers were given "clear and conspicuous" notice that they were only buying a "limited license" to access the game.
lime!
link
fedilink
English
1014d

that’s what the other side wants them to do, yes.

servers are probably to tightly integrated into ubi’s infra to publish but they don’t want to say that.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
213d

I figure it would be the “good enough compliance gesture” like when router makers dunp a barely-building code sample to comply with the GPL.

Create a post

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
  • 1 user online
  • 332 users / day
  • 503 users / week
  • 1.13K users / month
  • 3.37K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 5.44K Posts
  • 37.2K Comments
  • Modlog