This is about an old game for PSP, somewhere between 2008-2010. Devs used the escape clause in the contract to leave it during early stage, so the game was never made.
God the entire point is that it shouldn’t matter. Executives forcing one thing or the other is what is making everyone hate both forces male and forced “woke” characters. Just let the freaking creatives do their job and stop having some committee decide for them. It makes the stories so freaking awkward.
If the story makes sense, I don’t care. Let the creators make the characters they want and stop pushing agendas at all. If they want to make the queerest game let them. If they want a male protag, who cares. Executives are not creatives. (Neither are the panels of people they put in charge of market research either)
executives don’t give a fuck about anything except money. with a male hero you’re still getting the handful of girl gamers’ money, but with a woman hero you’re losing the wish-i-was-a-tough-guy boy gamers who are so insecure they literally can’t play a game as a woman character because their simple minds interpret that as “play woman character = i am literally a woman now = weak.”
yea, it’s fucking stupid, but that’s what’s happening. it’s the same ridiculous nonsense with non-white, non-straight characters
That definitely sounds like usual Ubisoft meddling. Hell, at that time Guillemot’s good friend Hascoet must have been in full directing power, shitting all over the Assassin’s Creed creative team’s decisions. While the company protected his sexual and moral harassment gig.
I can’t care less about Ubisoft being sold to whoever. Guillemot and his asshole clique don’t deserve shit.
Okay? Just make a good game, I dont think the main characters gender is really that important.
Though to be fair, the market is flooded with female main characters right now and with upcoming games, so I do appreciate the variety. Still, its an Ubisoft game and I probably wasnt going to buy it anyway.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc…
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.
Comments.
No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
This is about an old game for PSP, somewhere between 2008-2010. Devs used the escape clause in the contract to leave it during early stage, so the game was never made.
God the entire point is that it shouldn’t matter. Executives forcing one thing or the other is what is making everyone hate both forces male and forced “woke” characters. Just let the freaking creatives do their job and stop having some committee decide for them. It makes the stories so freaking awkward.
If the story makes sense, I don’t care. Let the creators make the characters they want and stop pushing agendas at all. If they want to make the queerest game let them. If they want a male protag, who cares. Executives are not creatives. (Neither are the panels of people they put in charge of market research either)
Reminds me of a joke I heard about Concord.
“Our marketing team was heavily involved in the making of our character designs”
“I can tell”
executives don’t give a fuck about anything except money. with a male hero you’re still getting the handful of girl gamers’ money, but with a woman hero you’re losing the wish-i-was-a-tough-guy boy gamers who are so insecure they literally can’t play a game as a woman character because their simple minds interpret that as “play woman character = i am literally a woman now = weak.”
yea, it’s fucking stupid, but that’s what’s happening. it’s the same ridiculous nonsense with non-white, non-straight characters
And with a male protagonist you lose all the “I don’t want to stare at a guy’s ass for an entire game” demographic.
Man dudes don’t know what they’re missing do they. I love femshep in 3rd person, but oh dang Geralt
First person: male
Third person: female
System: hacked
Edit: Do it in one game and you also get trans inclusivity tag! ^^
That definitely sounds like usual Ubisoft meddling. Hell, at that time Guillemot’s good friend Hascoet must have been in full directing power, shitting all over the Assassin’s Creed creative team’s decisions. While the company protected his sexual and moral harassment gig.
I can’t care less about Ubisoft being sold to whoever. Guillemot and his asshole clique don’t deserve shit.
Sounds like there’s plans of hot gay sex, count me in!
Okay? Just make a good game, I dont think the main characters gender is really that important.
Though to be fair, the market is flooded with female main characters right now and with upcoming games, so I do appreciate the variety. Still, its an Ubisoft game and I probably wasnt going to buy it anyway.
Man, ubisoft really is shitty