Tesla, a future case study for securities law classes across America, had to stop delivering Cybertrucks this past weekend. No, not because the hundred-thousand–dollar medium-duty pickup, which is only any of those things in the loosest interpretive sense, tends to brick when it gets rained on; nor because its stainless steel panels get all rusty […]
Who cares? The pedestrians in front of those monstrosities that will be chopped to pieces by that murder box. How the hell that thing can drive legally on any street is beyond me.
“We want people to be shouting, yelling at these things saying why, why won’t you work you stupid goddam piece of shit, why won’t you do the goddam thing you’re fucking supposed to”
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
I actually found the tone of the article (which is in tune with the title) quite refreshing, to the point that I read it all despite the fact I couldn’t care less about cars :)
IDK about the US press (I live elsewhere) but sometimes I feel the news could benefit from more candidly opinionated articles like this one and less professional-sounding pieces crafted to influence the readers’ opinions instead of informing them of the writer’s.
But because it’s all opinion, it gives me nothing except “some guy on the the internet has an opinion”. I can’t do anything with it, especially not form an opinion of my own. It’s just a waste of my time. Mind you, I already am of the opinion that Tesla is going to shit but I found very little in this article to substantiate that opinion should I need to argue for it myself, and the headline is just a plain out lie that that has no basis in the body text. It’s poorly written at best, and intentionally misleading at worst.
All media is biased despite some of it trying to be objective or parading a facade of objectivity. The nice part about obviously bias articles is that their bias is obvious, you don’t need to read between the lines.
If that means you feel it’s a waste of time to read, then you find out it’s a waste of your time faster and can move on.
This is old web journalism. All the links in the text are actual links to other articles or pieces of information. This is how most news articles were in the 90s and early 2k. Y’know, before all the links in the text turned into ad links. This article gives a jumping off point to find out more info. The opinion piece does nothing but attract attention to the information linked within.
We’re all here talking about it so it seems to have worked. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
Who cares? The pedestrians in front of those monstrosities that will be chopped to pieces by that murder box. How the hell that thing can drive legally on any street is beyond me.
~ 'murica
Yup
Wasn’t it the break pedal?
gas pedal – it was friction fit and would slide off and get jammed into one of the panels pressing down on the accelerator
Sounds like a break pedal to me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AyVh1_vWYQ
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://www.piped.video/watch?v=8AyVh1_vWYQ
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
American cars aren’t good, everybody knows that.
I have 2000 Saturn with 220,000 on it. It has been amazingly solid and low TCO.
Of course, they don’t make them anymore, so your point stands. They don’t make them like they used to.
i miss my saturn 💔
Teslas go above and beyond – and the Cybertruck takes it to another level past that …
As an American I was a bit upset and ready to retort to your comment. I then realized none of my cars are even American and you are probably right.
Just buy something German or Japanese
watch out though. I only learned after I bought it that some Honda Civics are manufactured in the UK 🤢
I did not know that
I think all my cars are Japanese except the 2003 wrangler I have… not sure who owns Jeep these days
Fiat.
Some megacorp called Stellantis as of 2021.
That’s an unholy merge of:
Technically if you bought a Toyota pickup truck it’s more American than some American named cars.
“can i have my 52 billion” - elon
Unbiased article 👍
Anti Commercial-AI license
Unbiased article 👍
*I hereby give permission to anyone that would like to use this comment for commercial means.
yea those anti-AI clauses are completely unenforceable, it’s just elitist virtue signaling.
Doesn’t hurt me
deleted by creator
Lmao! I had to reread what you said before it finally clicked. Thanks
“We want people to be shouting, yelling at these things saying why, why won’t you work you stupid goddam piece of shit, why won’t you do the goddam thing you’re fucking supposed to”
Yeah, that headline…
I actually found the tone of the article (which is in tune with the title) quite refreshing, to the point that I read it all despite the fact I couldn’t care less about cars :)
IDK about the US press (I live elsewhere) but sometimes I feel the news could benefit from more candidly opinionated articles like this one and less professional-sounding pieces crafted to influence the readers’ opinions instead of informing them of the writer’s.
But because it’s all opinion, it gives me nothing except “some guy on the the internet has an opinion”. I can’t do anything with it, especially not form an opinion of my own. It’s just a waste of my time. Mind you, I already am of the opinion that Tesla is going to shit but I found very little in this article to substantiate that opinion should I need to argue for it myself, and the headline is just a plain out lie that that has no basis in the body text. It’s poorly written at best, and intentionally misleading at worst.
All media is biased despite some of it trying to be objective or parading a facade of objectivity. The nice part about obviously bias articles is that their bias is obvious, you don’t need to read between the lines.
If that means you feel it’s a waste of time to read, then you find out it’s a waste of your time faster and can move on.
This is old web journalism. All the links in the text are actual links to other articles or pieces of information. This is how most news articles were in the 90s and early 2k. Y’know, before all the links in the text turned into ad links. This article gives a jumping off point to find out more info. The opinion piece does nothing but attract attention to the information linked within.
We’re all here talking about it so it seems to have worked. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
In before the first “AI TAKE THE WHEEL” fanatic drives into a crowd of school children