“I didn’t ad hom you” furiously ad homs some more

You’re really obnoxious, you know? So, you first make it about me (which is ad hominem, btw) and then you’re furious that I reply and make it about you?

So, correcting your nonsense is “ad hominem” now, huh? Newsflash: If you’re wrong and someone corrects you, it’s not ad hominem. And what the hell is the nonsense about moving the goalpost? Do you read what you type or do you just tell an AI to write your comments for you?

You sound like a sane person. Here you go, a lie as you wished.

I mean, one of us is “defending” use of a technology that helps people, the other is publicly bashing their sister, implying she’s stupid (which might or might not be true, not the point). I’ll leave the conclusion to other readers, I have no more to say to a person like you.

Conflating multiple things together, are we?

But hey, everyone who doesn’t share your exact world view on all issues is a Nazi!

Oh, someone did read a Wikipedia article! No, it was not “appeal to popularity,” it was meant to show that you’d be hard to find a product where at least small part wasn’t generated with AI, meaning singling this company out because they admitted it is bullshit.

I did and you’re right. That’s why I’m firmly in the “it’s just a fucking tool” gang.

Both people who treat it like a messiah and those who treat it like the worst thing ever seem pretty much insane to me.

I mean, it’s a tool. You can use a hammer to smash someone’s skull in or you can use it to put some nail on a wall.

If you see it used like that, it’s shitty developers, the AI is not to blame. Don’t get me wrong, I do have coworkers who use it like this and it sucks. One literally told to next time tell Copilot directly what to fix when I’m doing a review.

But overall it helps if you know how and most importantly when to use it.

Dude, go touch grass, please. This is embarrassing.

I didn’t mean it in the literal sense but if it makes you happy, we can pretend that whenever someone says “everyone” they mean it literally.

The anti AI crowd is getting crazy. Everyone uses it during development.

It’s a tool for fuck’s sake, what’s next? Banning designers from using Photoshop because using it is faster and thus taking jobs from multiple artists who would have to be employed otherwise?

I personally buy from GOG almost exclusively, but it really depends on you. If Steam features are important to you, use Steam. If what GOG’s doing with DRM is important to you, buy from GOG.

Can’t you continue buying games from both? And use Playnite or something? Or even just GOG Galaxy which has the ability to import your games from Steam and run them?

You can just put the game into Steam after install, works great.

Fucking disgusting. There’s no way to be a billionaire while not being a total shitstain that just sucks the society dry.

Now try the whole GOG catalog.

Over half my library is from GOG and over 95% of my gaming is on Linux. It’s as easy as Steam, you click install and play.

Well, for me GOG and its existence is one of the good news in gaming, so check that out if you didn’t yet!

Well, I personally don’t give a shit whether something is made by a human or a machine as long as the code is performing well and is readable.

Lucky for you and me both, AI is nowhere near capable of replacing a developer.

Learning new things is still needed, AI is good for mediocre tasks that need no real intelligence, but anything else still needs a human.

That’s why she was so memorable to me, she was kinda relatable - a regular common person, you don’t get that much in protagonists.

Jesse Faden, hands down the best.

Shitendo being shitty again. I seriously hate that company. Ruining people’s lives just so they get a few more dollars.

Driftland: The Magic Revival is pretty unique with the tiny shattered islands you have to connect to be part of your empire.

They said “honestly” didn’t they?

That sounds like no one really tried. Like, sure, you’ll get bullshit occasionally, but in the code you know exactly what the NPC is doing, so crafting a prompt based on that is not really that hard and will work most of the time, especially for the simple NPCs.

Yeah, the story is awesome, weird in a good way. Can’t wait for Control 2.

In that sense yes, but IMO it falls a little bit short on multiple fronts.

The first Witcher definitely has clunky controls. But 3 is a masterpiece. 2 falls somewhere in between.

Well, it’s sometimes called Italian strike.

Question is question. It’s made of question. Wtf is this comment?

That is very extremely false equivalence. First, equating right to abortion with right to buy nsfw games is ridiculous. If I only could choose one, it would definitely be right to abortion and I would hope most people would vote the same.

Second, I’m simply saying if a store doesn’t offer what you want, why not support the one that does?

Help us, gods of all false equivalences!

Well, guess I now own a bunch of porn games because I naively thought I could l could claim them one by one and tried to claim Postal 2.

I mean, three people calling Mastercard will do nothing as well.

Well, you could buy on GOG.

So, as a born and raised Czech I shouldn’t play it?

Nothing like burning money on bullshit to help with your money trouble.

What kind of aggressive DRM? Wouldn’t the same kind of hack as usual work? As in, hack the hardware, every game becomes playable?

I’m weirdly excited that soon it will be a full year of daily screenshots.

Critics like her say the very term “gold digger” reeks of misogyny.

No, the term itself doesn’t imply gender at all.

Anyway, I never really saw the problem with gold diggers, it’s a relationship like any other - you give your partner something they need and the partner gives you something you need.

So what if one of the parties needs money and the other a young woman to feel better? If there’s no coercion and no actual scamming, I don’t see the problem.

So because you do it correctly, everyone else should get fucked or what? Like, you know how many people have bad parents?

So, congrats, your kids won’t suffer from that (or maybe they will once they have their own money because the path way of “spend a $1, get an in-game item, get an instant rush of feel-good hormones” is forming even with moderation). But other kids may, unless of course you think that it’s somehow their fault they have shitty parents.

So no, I really don’t want this around kids whose lives will be ruined just so your kids can have a fun time (which they can have in other ways, including other games).