Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc…
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
Beehaw.org gaming
Lemmy.ml gaming
lemmy.ca pcgaming
- 1 user online
- 76 users / day
- 408 users / week
- 1.12K users / month
- 3.94K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 12.5K Posts
- 86.6K Comments
- Modlog
Bold implication he had any in him in the first place
Does that mean we don’t need to pander to adult themes and we can have silly games like Jak and Daxter now?
Do you mean like ratchet and clank? Sackboy? Spiderman? Astrobot?
Are we just mad that games that “pander” to “adult themes” exist at all?
He pretty clearly meant Naughty Dog, hence Jak and Daxter
Except Naughty dog when asked specially said they weren’t doing to make “childrens” games anymore like it’s something beneath them. I quite liked/like those games.
Maybe saying that is as dumb as saying “pandering adult themes”
Probably but I don’t have a fanbase
We can see why.
These damn film directors, too! Every movie should be PG because if everyone can’t enjoy it, nobody should!!
No, you see everyone not making something I like is taking stuff away from me personally and that’s what matters above all
I hate when others express themselves artistically without consulting with me, their only audience, first
I personally don’t like the direction Naughty Dog have taken for the past decade or so because their games have become less “game-y” (for lack of a better term). Yes the shooting/traversal is mechanically competent and the story is well directed, but I think that they are hewing much more closely to a long-form television show format. The fact that Last of Us was able to be adapted into a tv show so seamlessly also suggests this is the case.
The colourful worlds of Crash Bandicoot and Jak & Daxter were Rare-esque and much more to my personal taste. This isn’t because they are aimed at younger audiences per se; games can aim at adult demographics without aping another medium. Some personal favourites would be series like Souls, Resident Evil and God of War.
I have a Jak and Daxter sized hole in my heart. Love those games. Been playing them on the Steam Deck a bit.
Cya cuckman
Lmao good. Maybe he can get his ass out of the way and let someone competent make games instead
Not my genre, so I’m unfamiliar. Wasn’t last of us a critical hit?
They’re both masterpieces. Unfortunately a bunch of whiny children dislike the second one for whiny childish reasons. Its only real issue is pacing.
There are some real complaints to be had. I think not liking the more realistic/explicit presentation of violence is fair. I think the visceral behaviour of games does make it a different experience to the same violence you’d see in a movie.
I also think disliking Neil Druckmann as a person is valid, he has some quotes that seem snobby.
Not enjoying cinematics games in general could also be an avenue for complaints but I think none of these are explicit complaints about tLoU2
I mean personal preference is one thing, whilst issues are another. It doesn’t aim to not be violent or not use plenty of cutscenes.
Yeah, Druckmann is a visionary creator, they all sound like that, just gotta put up with it really.
Not all directors come across that way but signalling them as a visionary suggests some slight bias.
I also don’t really understand what your trying to say above, isolating “preference” and “issues” doesn’t really make sense since issues form from preference and art is not objective.
I didn’t say all directors come across that way, I said visionary creators do.