All true - and yet somehow, it still released to positive reviews. The consumer outcry came after release, the reviewers having gotten a tightly curated experience.
It had positive reviews on release because they wouldn’t give console copies to reviewers, and professional reviewers tended to have the beefy gaming rigs that could play it well.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Now just imagine the feels if you committed to quality all the time…
Fool me once…
Fool me twice, can’t get fooled again
I’ve heard that’s a saying in Tennessee, I mean Texas, they probably have it in Tennessee
All I want is a conclusion to the FF:06:B5 mystery!
Didn’t Cyberpunk launch to positive reviews as well? At this point it’s meaningless.
Nope it didn’t. It was a buggy mess on release with huge performance problems and missing features.
All true - and yet somehow, it still released to positive reviews. The consumer outcry came after release, the reviewers having gotten a tightly curated experience.
I’m pretty sure it didn’t release to positive reviews.
Unless all the positivity we’re talking about is journalist reviews and not people being incredibly angry at the game
In fact wasn’t there a review ban on 2077’s original release?
It had positive reviews on release because they wouldn’t give console copies to reviewers, and professional reviewers tended to have the beefy gaming rigs that could play it well.
What is this? A new monetization model? Pay4Redempion?