FSR4 is really, really good. In one important way, it’s actually better than DLSS: it doesn’t have those really distracting disocclusion trails that DLSS has.
The catch is thst your game needs to have FSR4, which is still very new, because like you pointed out, earlier versions were not good.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Almost… I wish it had access to DLSS, FSR looks so horrendous, especially before actual hardware acceleration like we have on RDNA 2.
It will come. It’s still in it’s infancy.
Idk what you’re smoking, FSR 3 is great, FSR 2.1 is just fine, and were up to 4 now
FSR4 is really, really good. In one important way, it’s actually better than DLSS: it doesn’t have those really distracting disocclusion trails that DLSS has.
The catch is thst your game needs to have FSR4, which is still very new, because like you pointed out, earlier versions were not good.