I expect they tell us it can achieve that because under the hood DLSS4 gives it more performance if enabled.

But is that a fair comparison?

Yep. Even a bad game can be good when played coop.

It seems like the writing is leaning on being negative.

“These 2 games don’t work, even with FSR”

Okay, legitimate issue.

“This game doesn’t with without FSR”

That’s what FSR is for, and now you don’t want to use it. This isn’t an issue.

I enjoyed the original, what seems like decades ago now. This seems good 👍

Thanks for your reply. I understand a lot better now.

The comment said it was proprietary and uses signal and MLS.

Maybe I misunderstood.

I didn’t know MLS and Signal were Google proprietary. TIL. Thanks.

It’s a shame Apple decided not to implement e2ee like Google did.

This is an older article, but there is still no movement. https://forums.appleinsider.com/discussion/234352/apples-flavor-of-rcs-wont-support-googles-end-to-end-encryption-extension

Lemmy demographic feels like mostly Linux users.

Lemmy posters are on vegan level of promoting Linux, and sith level of hate on Windows.

I really like the original game, I just find it really difficult. I want to beat it at least once. After several pay throughs, I finally killed the last boss only to reveal another act! I died shortly after and haven’t got that far again. Sucks for me.

That’s odd. Has always been dependable for me and my family over the years.

In no way in hell is it worth the amount poured into it. Which leads to the only conclusion that the money is being mishandled. Put simpler: it’s a scam

BF2 will hold a special place in my heart. I had many good times in that game. BF3 and onwards only got worse at each iteration. Call of duty was a major influence on the game and it eventually fell out of favour with me.

Having a default and per app setting is actually super useful and isn’t a hassle

Can Apple have third party home screens?

As long as you’re saying that in the same way as normal phone calls distract, then I agree.

Teams becomes a replacement for phones in business, so likely be more used for 1:1 calls than meetings.

Starts to feel like a game on early access.

But when the mods are removed from Nexus…

My phone really struggled to render the web page. Looks great though

Probably easier to tell if there were images. Why are they missing

I don’t know how impressive it is unless it gets compared to a cable with similar features, of which there are many… at a fraction of the cost. So it would be excellent to see the same scans on a £30 cable to see just how over engineered the Apple cable may or may not be.

They didn’t need to nuke it. Why not both

How would you want that to be handled? The monitor is removed from the system. Do you want a phantom monitor to remain in place, with applications and desktop, no longer accessible?

Reminds me of New World. That was full of exploits and each time the devs blocked trading, sometimes for days at a time.

Why not both

It feels like an easily solvable problem. Every key is unique. It can be centrally tracked from it’s origin to the buyer. Steam should allow the easy revocation of keys if reported as bought with fraudulent means.

If you are on PC, and the right hand is your mouse hand, you just need to be able to click at least one mouse button. It normally uses 2 mouse buttons but you can remap

You just described my playstyle :) The Frostburn gloves help with mana regen, 5+% lucky shot chance to return 20%+ mana, plus a ~20% chance to freeze on any hit. Using Avalanche instead of Shatter can help with free Ice Shard casts and there is an aspect for Avalanche to proc twice. You probably know all this though as its super meta. I’m worried of nerfs :(

I think the Altar of Lilith spawns some mobs when you activate it, but its in town so they just sit there.

I am loving Ice Shards tbh, seems very meta at the moment, but its just sooooo good :)

Every interaction on Lemmy is copied to all other federated instances. There are instances all over the world with a copy of yours and my comment. They can track and use those comments for any purpose. Its both a blessing and a curse of an open federated structure.

Bitwarden is 10 a year, but only if you want the premium features. It works well completely free, which is why it’s so popular.

Then you should know that attackers don’t take your plain-text or cracked password and the start manually guessing similar codes on your other accounts

Oh they absolutely do.

You keep going back to hashing methodology. I totally agree that if the website hashes your password correctly, its unlikely to be compromised.

That said, you are trusting the website in that regard, when it has been repeatedly proven that there are sites, even large ones, have exposed passwords.

You said at the beginning of this thread that you can’t trust password managers to manage your password correctly. But you trust random websites with that password instead.

So put your hashing discussion to one side, and think of the scenerio where your passwords are not encrypted. Because you can’t guarentee that they are.

What got me into this discussion was your comment

Changing even a single letter will completely scramble your password with hash, so for all intents and purpose it is equivalent to a unique password

It is just such bad advice. Anyone who thinks changing a few letters in their password used accross multiple sites deserves to be hacked.

Edit: I’m going to stop here. I don’t think I’m getting through. Thanks for the chat.

I totally understand. I think you’re missing my point.

I am willing to bet multiple sites we both signed up store their passwords in cleartext (or unsalted hashes, or broken hashing methods).

So the attackers now have one of our passwords. They may even have a number of our passwords. In my case, using a password manager, the attacker has multiple completely random strings that I have used as passwords. In your case, the attacker has 2 passwords that look very much the same, although a little changed. You are now screwed.

Password managers holds the key to all my other accounts, where as a random poorly secured site do not

You admitted your passwords are not unique or random, so they do in fact have a definite insight into your other passwords.

a compromised host means I also lose my banking and work account

All password managers recommended in this thread use the master password to encrypt your data.

a compromised host

As suiggested, there are self-hosted versions of these password managers so you don’t necessarily need to trust a host

but that is just not how hash works

You are holding onto the “hash” premise but you aren’t guarenteed that your passwords are being hashed. As I said before, if a site is compromised and your not-random password is leaked, you are vulnerable to having all of your accounts exposed.

I think you are set in your ways, I have tried to enlighten you. I hope your choices don’t come back to bite you in the future.

Password are leaked all the time. You are trusting the website with your password, but won’t trust a password manager.

There are self hosted versions of password managers that solve the issues you described. Just read the comments here, some great recommendations.

I’ve used bitwarden for a number of years for personal use. My job uses 1Password which I’ve used for 7 months.

In features they are very similar.

Bitwarden has more granular URL matching (can use regex to match websites) whilst 1Password is weaker in this area (can do subdomain but no URI matching, no wildcard or regex).

1Password UX is much better, certainly feels like a paid for service.

1Password is much more expensive (monthly subscription)

1Password 2FA can read QR codes from the screen and automatically puts the code into the website. Bitwarden needs the QR text pasting into the password entry and puts the code into clipboard when the password is used.

Bitwarden can be self hosted (Vaultwarden).

Overall I think I prefer 1Password but not enough to pay the subscription. Work do give me a free personal account but I don’t like relying on small possible temporary benefits. So I stick with bitwarden. I pay the $10 a year and I’m happy.

Edit: corrected mistake in bitwarden cost