That article feels unfinished, but at least the author pushes back a little. Those numbers cannot possibly be true. And if they somehow are, based on my experience cleaning up that code will take nearly as long as a person writing it from scratch.
Idk… 80-90% of a game isn’t the code that is doing all the real work of making it a game. Most of a game is art, music, sound, etc. Things easily made by AI that would not affect the playability of the game. That’s why credits for games are hundreds to thousands of people who worked on art-central parts of the game, and the programming team is like 3 dudes. Big companies would like to have just the 3 dudes. Especially since they understand code and can serve as IT for the AI art “team.”
Maybe the reality is that 80-90% of their programmers actively use tools like Github Copilot and the CEO got really excited about what that might mean. I mean, how could he possibly measure this?
The figures that fortune 500 companies give for how much of their new code is AI generated are also wildly exaggerated, likely for similar reasons. It makes investors fork over cash for the near term. They’ll all lean on plausible deniability when it all becomes obviously untrue.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc…
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.
Comments.
No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
That article feels unfinished, but at least the author pushes back a little. Those numbers cannot possibly be true. And if they somehow are, based on my experience cleaning up that code will take nearly as long as a person writing it from scratch.
Is it a mistranslation and they mean intellij intellisense or something?
Aren’t Layton games basically a visual novel?
They are puzzle games with a visual novel for the framing device
If a game was 80% made by AI it would be literally unplayable.
Idk… 80-90% of a game isn’t the code that is doing all the real work of making it a game. Most of a game is art, music, sound, etc. Things easily made by AI that would not affect the playability of the game. That’s why credits for games are hundreds to thousands of people who worked on art-central parts of the game, and the programming team is like 3 dudes. Big companies would like to have just the 3 dudes. Especially since they understand code and can serve as IT for the AI art “team.”
If you look at his quote, he’s literally saying that 80-90% of the game code is being written by AI.
Maybe the reality is that 80-90% of their programmers actively use tools like Github Copilot and the CEO got really excited about what that might mean. I mean, how could he possibly measure this?
The figures that fortune 500 companies give for how much of their new code is AI generated are also wildly exaggerated, likely for similar reasons. It makes investors fork over cash for the near term. They’ll all lean on plausible deniability when it all becomes obviously untrue.