For PC gaming news and discussion.
PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
- 1 user online
- 90 users / day
- 384 users / week
- 1.15K users / month
- 3.27K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 7.19K Posts
- 58.4K Comments
- Modlog
Nvidia, Intel and AMD: their business now is circular money with AI and not PC gaming industry anymore.
What does AI have to do with this? It’s a Qualcomm chip, not made by any of those companies.
That’s their point.
Huh?
They are saying the fact that Qualcomm isn’t involved with AI stuff (at least not yet in a big way) is a reason to buy their stuff.
I don’t see how ARM, especially when Qualcomm is the only realistic option, is the solution here. Also, basic x86-64 patents have lapsed last year and newer extensions will lapse step by step. ARM64 is still so new, its initial patents will only lapse in 10 years.
Er, and you think ARM is somehow not involved?