Water is wet. You could’ve easily written the headline saying CD projekt sees future in multiplayer micro transactions. He specifically was hedging that fact with the interview question answer that did not specify between the two. Then this article pops up to carry their water.
The sad part is, they didn’t even likely pay him for this.
Google (and reddit) deals with tons and tons of those requests every day. Now, more than likely, Archive.org would be the one to remove it but that wouldn’t prevent whoever is contracted with the rights holder from sending it to hosting providers that link to it as well (after they find said link indexed in a search engine).
It’s not about media or taxes, it’s about inflated fees for traffic period. It’s regulatory capture (which Korea has a long history of) and subsequent collusion by Korean ISPs. Prohibitively expensive to run a streaming service like that even if you have local datacenters to reduce international transit fees (because you still have to connect to the local ISPs who will still charge you). https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/08/17/afterword-korea-s-challenge-to-standard-internet-interconnection-model-pub-85166
Edit: To be clear, this sort of situation is about the only one where to effectively have a streaming service, you’d need to use peer to peer and make it “come from inside the house”, so to speak. Even their local streaming services are over the barrel and only the ISPs themselves could actually make an affordable streaming service.
Portal is the college project or some sort of prototype
It was a game designed in college but commercially published (by the college digipen) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narbacular_Drop
I’m sorry, but proclaiming that Jews are conspiratorially poisoning the world against whites is not remotely related to Israel/Palestine. It’s blatant Nazi shit. Muddying the waters is also generally crypto-fascist shit, but I don’t know you and I’m not going to put that label on you. Just realize that’s what you’re doing.
In the US, if you’re moved to another location for that amount of time involuntarily that’s an arrest not a detention. Seems the French code gives more police powers than our constitution.
Edit: they need something similar to what we’d call probable cause and I’d personally call it an arrest without charges https://www.sba-avocats.com/Criminal-defense-attorney-paris-france-police-custody-mobile.html
They also have similar rights against self incrimination in France.
The photocells, when illuminated by a pulsed laser, provide power to the electronic circuits on the chip with ~10% efficiency. The chip transmits its ID through modulated current in the antenna. The varying magnetic field around the chip is received by a nearby coil in the reader, and the signal is digitized, analyzed, and decoded.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896163/
So it’s security is that it’s not near field based but photovoltaic based. You’d have to copy it’s design to clone it.
Maybe my argument wasn’t as plainitively obvious as I thought it was. The only way to develop an opinion on quality is to personally trust the supplier or rely on trademarks. Without either you will not know if you’re getting the same product and quality will vary wildly. In an open market, the only way is to rely on trademarks. Place of origin is an extension of the trademark system.
This actually may be unconscionable if it’s considered to be “never share a negative opinion about the game in perpetuity” as it’s worded.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unconscionability