For PC gaming news and discussion.
PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
- 1 user online
- 74 users / day
- 313 users / week
- 855 users / month
- 3.13K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 4.48K Posts
- 28.8K Comments
- Modlog
Wow, what a terrible set of moves by whoever at AMD made that call. Lack of CUDA support is the only thing keeping me from buying AMD GPUs, and I’m pretty sure I’m not alone.
For me it’s lack of driver support that’s keeping me from buying AMD cards. Has been for literal decades. I’ve never had a more unreal number of bluescreen crashes and black/frozen screen hangups than with AMD cards. Ever since switching to nVidia, maybe one per two years. Every now and then I try AMD again when replacing a card (last in 2016 when the RX480 was touted as a bargain) but the story remains the same.
Drivers are usually amd’s advantage
That whole thing reads like a fever dream
Guy was able to get Cuda on AMD, Really?!
AMD, approved, well yeah that makes sense.
Psych! We take it back??? Ummm why?
nVidia said no?
And nobody forked it before it came down?
Someone will have it and then later if necessary there will be community re-written version. (crowd funded for example ) Doesn’t make sense to chase down a taken down version at this point.
edit: article was updated, the maker gonna re-do the parts from pre-AMD funding point so it’s a clean one.
Daily reminder that corporations are not our friends
Doesn’t that smell like lawyers got a wind of this and asked how much money are you willing to lose on this?
Sounds to me like lawyers got wind of it and were worried that NVIDIA might sue them because they paid to have it made. They would likely be concerned about this whether or not NVIDIA had a case.