Makes absolute sense. Brand new chips rarely showed problems instantly, it took a few months time. The CPUs have been out for a while and only recently these problems surfaced.
“Enshittification”, as Cory Doctorow coined the term, refers specifically to companies transitioning from growth to monetization phase; it was common for a number of online Internet services to have a phase heavily-oriented on growth, because most of their costs were fixed, making it highly-advantageous to be large, and thus worthwhile to lose money for some time growing prior to becoming profitable.
That doesn’t mean that things that aren’t specifically doing that aren’t being “enshittified”–turned into shit–in other ways. Capitalism would see everything eventually turn to shit in order to squeeze out some more profit or more growth. Nothing can grow forever.
Enshitification is when a company’s quality decreases in favor of pocketing more money. It’s about greed and projecting the illusion you’re growing as a company. Shareholders like growth. This is exactly what intel is doing.
They cant pocket more money by selling their existing product for more money, as people won’t pay for it and profits will decrease.
They can’t pocket more money by selling a better product as that costs money in itself and won’t guarantee the return you’re looking for.
The only other play is to slim down your existing product and pray no one notices.
Intel chose the last option.
And it doesn’t necessarily have to be about pocketing extra money. Lots of companies took a big hit because of Covid and interest rates. Lots of companies that were profitable are now in the red because of interest rates. Supply chain issues also had a strong impact on company growth and profitability. So in desperate attempt to stay “profitable” some companies elect to decrease quality to save money as there is no other way to produce additional profit to keep going.
If you make your product worse over time and it’s at the expense of your customers, then you’re effectively enshitifying.
Language is an evolving thing. Doctorow coined the word to specifically apply to marketplaces who control the link between consumers and producers (or multiple such relationships when you add in advertising and/or selling data)
It quickly was expanded to generally refer to user/customer hostile practices we see in late stage capitalism
I think he even spoke about it in an interview with Adam Hanover, once you put a word out there it takes on a life of its own
So glad I didn’t pull the trigger on a laptop last month. I was leaning AMD but some intel offerings looked nicer and cheaper. I guess that’s one of the reasons.
GOP appointed circuit judge says LMAO. Customers appeal to supreme court, but scheduling is going to be complicated because Clarence Thomas went on 6 month vacation on the yatch IntelInside.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc…
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.
Comments.
No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Makes absolute sense. Brand new chips rarely showed problems instantly, it took a few months time. The CPUs have been out for a while and only recently these problems surfaced.
Replace or refund them no questions asked, Intel.
My next build is definitely going to be AMD. Getting sick of intel enshitification.
“Enshittification”, as Cory Doctorow coined the term, refers specifically to companies transitioning from growth to monetization phase; it was common for a number of online Internet services to have a phase heavily-oriented on growth, because most of their costs were fixed, making it highly-advantageous to be large, and thus worthwhile to lose money for some time growing prior to becoming profitable.
Intel isn’t doing that.
That doesn’t mean that things that aren’t specifically doing that aren’t being “enshittified”–turned into shit–in other ways. Capitalism would see everything eventually turn to shit in order to squeeze out some more profit or more growth. Nothing can grow forever.
Enshitification is when a company’s quality decreases in favor of pocketing more money. It’s about greed and projecting the illusion you’re growing as a company. Shareholders like growth. This is exactly what intel is doing.
They cant pocket more money by selling their existing product for more money, as people won’t pay for it and profits will decrease.
They can’t pocket more money by selling a better product as that costs money in itself and won’t guarantee the return you’re looking for.
The only other play is to slim down your existing product and pray no one notices.
Intel chose the last option.
And it doesn’t necessarily have to be about pocketing extra money. Lots of companies took a big hit because of Covid and interest rates. Lots of companies that were profitable are now in the red because of interest rates. Supply chain issues also had a strong impact on company growth and profitability. So in desperate attempt to stay “profitable” some companies elect to decrease quality to save money as there is no other way to produce additional profit to keep going.
If you make your product worse over time and it’s at the expense of your customers, then you’re effectively enshitifying.
Language is an evolving thing. Doctorow coined the word to specifically apply to marketplaces who control the link between consumers and producers (or multiple such relationships when you add in advertising and/or selling data)
It quickly was expanded to generally refer to user/customer hostile practices we see in late stage capitalism
I think he even spoke about it in an interview with Adam Hanover, once you put a word out there it takes on a life of its own
So glad I didn’t pull the trigger on a laptop last month. I was leaning AMD but some intel offerings looked nicer and cheaper. I guess that’s one of the reasons.
Intel better be replacing the faulty shit they sold…
They replaced my 14700k
“lol” says Intel, “LMAO”
Lets see how the courts handle this…
In the US it’s probably going to go like:
Or alternatively:
Nah, these days you just give out a $10 Uber Eats code to those affected.
IIRC they’re replacing damaged chips.