I still don’t see what historical data has to do with the fact that Intel is CURRENTLY self-destructing, while AMD’s performance has left it in a position of best performance for the dollar, without continual crashing.
I don’t find an argument of “well, 5 years ago” very convincing when I’m talking about the current position
I am curious how you think “% of CPUs world wide” would change in one month so quickly, especially while the self destruction is so recent…
Like, you are in an article about how server users are currently finding 50%-100% of intel CPU’s are failing, and saying “well, this historical data says…”
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
AMD just delayed their 9000 series too, the Intel issues have caused them to be more careful, thanks Intel!
I mean, if it prevents the sort of issues that Intel’s chips are hitting, that would be a good thing for users.
maybe it was not a sarcastic “thanks”.
Its amazing to watch Intel self destruct. For so long they were the king, and AMD was a distant second. Now AMD is the undisputed king.
Anyone know how User Bench Marks is taking this?
Doesn’t look like it
https://www.statista.com/statistics/735904/worldwide-x86-intel-amd-market-share/
I’m not sure what historical data would have to do with a rapidly evolving story.
In the last 5 years Intel has had near 70% marketshare
That would not put AMD in the position of undisputed king
I still don’t see what historical data has to do with the fact that Intel is CURRENTLY self-destructing, while AMD’s performance has left it in a position of best performance for the dollar, without continual crashing.
I don’t find an argument of “well, 5 years ago” very convincing when I’m talking about the current position
“The last 5 years” includes all the years in that time period
Intel currently has a market lead
I am curious how you think “% of CPUs world wide” would change in one month so quickly, especially while the self destruction is so recent…
Like, you are in an article about how server users are currently finding 50%-100% of intel CPU’s are failing, and saying “well, this historical data says…”
AMD has been better the whole Ryzen life-span
But it’s irrelevant
It was sales in the year, but you’re the one claiming they’re the King. At least now you realize how foolish your statement was
Ngl 50% is kinda high…