Nope, never said it sucked, never even said which way that mattered…
But if you read the article:
Concurrent player numbers on Steam have been okay but not great, peaking out at a little over 6,000 concurrents during Atomfall’s first weekend of release. The 1.5 million player count is no doubt driven largely by Atomfall’s presence on Game Pass, where everyone can give it a spin for no more cost than what they’re paying for their subscription anyway.
6k on steam…
The single largest platform for PC games.
Meaning most are on Game pass.
We can’t say everyone who tried it for free would have bought it. Which makes these numbers less valuable.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
Being free on Xbox and PC thru game pass really makes these numbers less valuable…
That’s not how free works.
Honestly, game pass on PC is such a good deal it’s basically free
But yeah, I should have said “free” instead of free.
Agreed on the deal. But still not free. I have it for now what? 5 years? I don’t see it stopping any time soon.
Would people be playing it if it sucked?
Nope, never said it sucked, never even said which way that mattered…
But if you read the article:
6k on steam…
The single largest platform for PC games.
Meaning most are on Game pass.
We can’t say everyone who tried it for free would have bought it. Which makes these numbers less valuable.
Does it make sense now?