Goronmon
link
fedilink
11Y

I mean yeah but gamers keep supporting shitty companies…

Yeah, shitty companies like Valve with their lootbox nonsense and other gambling mechanics are really bringing the industry down.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
131Y

They’re entirely cosmetic in Valve games as far as I’m aware

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
81Y

Yeah, I like Valve but fuck those loot boxes, their tolerance of gambling, and screw that bs excuse of “it’s only cosmetic” because we know it’s not and it preys on the same insecurities and uses the same psychological tools to maximize profits using addiction.

MrScottyTay
link
fedilink
English
10
edit-2
1Y

The argument of cosmetic only microtransactions is also a bit of a weak one because it’s the sort of content that would usually just be in the base game, unlockable via gameplay or tied to cheat codes. At least this used to be the case.

Cosmetic only is still better than other types but it’s still a case of the lesser of two evils.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
101Y

Yeah, the only reason anybody says that is because we’re so desensitized by pay-to-win mechanics and games being released half finished with day 1 dlc to fill the gaps, so we say “at least it’s better than that”

Remember horse armor? I bet there’s plenty of video games out now with cosmetic horse armor for sale.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
21Y

Cosmetic-only microtransactions in Free to Play games are absolutely fine, and should be encouraged. Those games wouldn’t exist without them.

In paid games it’s a different matter though, sure.

Nefyedardu
link
fedilink
4
edit-2
1Y

What’s wrong with it? Literally every single gameplay-related item in both Dota and CSGO are free. 100%, no strings attached. You can experience the entire game and what it has to offer without spending a dime. At some point you have to charge for something. These companies aren’t making these game out of charity, they are in fact businesses. You can criticize the methods they use to push them (lootboxes, BP, etc) but I don’t see a problem with the concept.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
11Y

I like the way Grinding Gear does it with POE, a FTP game supported by cosmetic-only micro transactions. The stash tabs are the closest thing to “pay to win”.

GladiusB
link
fedilink
English
41Y

We game for what we game for. Some people game for the cosmetics. They are selling what consumers buy. I’m not saying it’s right. But if they keep buying why wouldn’t they sell it?

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
6
edit-2
1Y

Yes, Valve’s CS loot boxes and ignoring of the gambling sites that profit off of gamers addiction is absolutely bullshit but you’re a disingenuous troll if you think Valve is the leading offender of shitty monetization rampant in the industry.

Create a post

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

  • 1 user online
  • 141 users / day
  • 757 users / week
  • 2.28K users / month
  • 6.31K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 4.88K Posts
  • 100K Comments
  • Modlog