Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc…
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
Beehaw.org gaming
Lemmy.ml gaming
lemmy.ca pcgaming
- 1 user online
- 103 users / day
- 419 users / week
- 1.12K users / month
- 3.95K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 12.5K Posts
- 86.7K Comments
- Modlog
What is “five times shorter?” Is that one fifth as long? We can’t really measure the shortness of a thing, only its length.
Sorry, it’s a pet peeve of mine.
It should have said “…is 0.2 times longer”
0.2 times the length of*
I read that as 20% longer… aka 120% the length.
What about “…is 0.2 times the length”
0.2 times as long.
No, that would be 20% longer, not five times shorter.
Yeah, good point. May just be clear and say “It is 1/5th the length”?
20% longer means 120% of the length.
Yes but how girthy is it?
I think we can measure your shortness of breath right there, tho
Nope, but you can measure my respiratory rate.
I would have commented just this and nothing else if you weren’t already doing god’s work.
The shortness of a thing is an aspect of its length. Your comment makes no sense. Five times shorter means that you can play Mirage five times in the same time it takes to play Valhalla once. I’m pedantic as hell but this comes off to me as fake pedantry.
Yeah, I’m being quite pedantic, but it is genuine. It’s a common language mistake that frustrates me.
Don’t try to multiply a relative descriptor when you can use hard numbers (i.e. it’s 20 hours shorter) or the appropriate relative measurement (i.e. it’s 20% as long). It’s both improper English and less clear (maybe “2 times harder to understand”?) to do so.