Bethesda has already run up against the wall of insurmountable expectations with Starfield, which by most measures was good but not great. That’s resulted in a sub-60% user rating on Steam and a general sense that the game was somehow a failure—or at the very least, a fumble.
Ah no. The problem with Starfield is mostly that they didn’t know where to go with it.
I could understand that moons are moons, but maybe juuuust maybe have more than like 5 different POIs?
We all know Bethesdas plan was to let modders make their game for them while they charge you for it under the guise of “we want creators to make money!”
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
Ah no. The problem with Starfield is mostly that they didn’t know where to go with it.
They thought the open planets concept would be as appealing as the open worlds concept and it’s not cuz the world’s are boring.
I could understand that moons are moons, but maybe juuuust maybe have more than like 5 different POIs?
We all know Bethesdas plan was to let modders make their game for them while they charge you for it under the guise of “we want creators to make money!”
Also no one wanted a Space Dragonborn.