Compare Starfield(330.7k > 9.2k) to games like Spiderman remaster(66.4k > 5.1k) or RE4(168k > 2.9k) or Armored Core 6(156.1k > 1.3k) or even a game build with multiplayer and replayability like Elden Ring(953.4k > 47.3k), all in 5 months timeframe, i think it’s to be expected as starfield didn’t launch with mod tools. The score doesn’t looks good tho, as people really don’t like the gameplay loop and the loading.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
How does that look for other singleplayer games that take some 50-100 hours to beat?
Copied from above comment:
Skyrim base + special edition = 28.5k
Fallout 4 = 18k
Fallout 76 = 8.3k
Starfield = 9.2k
Thanks. I meant how many percent they lost after 6 months.
Compare Starfield(330.7k > 9.2k) to games like Spiderman remaster(66.4k > 5.1k) or RE4(168k > 2.9k) or Armored Core 6(156.1k > 1.3k) or even a game build with multiplayer and replayability like Elden Ring(953.4k > 47.3k), all in 5 months timeframe, i think it’s to be expected as starfield didn’t launch with mod tools. The score doesn’t looks good tho, as people really don’t like the gameplay loop and the loading.