



Mod support backs devs into corners. And it’s unreasonable to expect all game devs to take the extra time.
If all users stopped bitching about breaking changes, we would have different story here.
And if users didn’t expect to have full freedom to mod multiplayer games (exploits) the whole story would be different too.
See, this is a toxic attitude to promulgate. They are not charging an outrageous price. It’s not a subscription. It’s not an unfinished game. It’s not locked to the Epic Games store. It’s being actively maintained. It’s not being sold by a toxic publisher like EA. It’s an indie developer. Etc. etc.
It’s just a simple product, with a simple price. And you insist you have the right to obtain a copy of it without paying because they don’t offer discounts. This just isn’t reasonable. You don’t have a right to a copy of this game. It’s entertainment. It’s a product that those who work on it derive their lively hood from. It’s not food. It’s not shelter. It’s not healthcare.


It was, and I felt the same way.
But I fear I was naive, and didn’t see that a single distributor/platform dominating could be bad. Even only having two or three would be bad.
It was easy to cheer them on when they were an alternative to cable and broadcast and home video. But now that all those other things have become diminished, I think it’s strange to complain that one service doesn’t have all content from all producers.
I also think music streaming platforms are a bit strange. But the sheer volume of songs vs movies and tv make that a different animal. And we have managed to have some competition there.
I think people should be arguing for content to be across more platforms, not for it to all be on one platform. But you’re not going to get Warner brothers and Disney to agree to swapping content unless they are required to by law. If people argue for one platform having everything, they might be doing it because they see it as the most plausible “remedy” to their woes. But that’s not a good idea.
We might need to get distribution platforms and production companies broken into separate entities. Studios probally shouldn’t own platforms. Just like they shouldn’t own theater chains.
Exhibition and content creation should be separate for the long term health of both parties and consumers.


This was intuitive and obvious to anyone paying attention to AI and who knows video game engines. Nvidia trying to imply anything else is really shitty.
When it comes to generating lighting and atmospheric and dynamic surface effects in real time, calculating each mesh or surface in the scene instead of one big collective pass would be even more demanding. And will likely be beyond their capabilities for a very long time.


I’m curious how well it handles lighting from unseen light sources that otherwise didn’t contribute as much to the scene as they should have. In other words, off screen lights that shine into the scene but are not fully rendered by traditional means. Same thing goes for reflections.
I expect a lot of nonsense being hallucinated in those areas.


Classics of Game [YT] appears to be working through uploading clips from the game right now. Their channel format is absurd clips from obscure games. So it’s a perfect fit.
I’m not familiar with the channel enough to know if they have been previously hit with a take down. (And I didn’t read the article link) I’m guessing they were, based on the YouTube comments. Edit: I just noticed the “episode” numbers make it clear these are re-uploads.
Doesn’t Gamers Nexus interview the guy who runs that company? Like, they have a working relationship?
I wonder what his rants about this are like.