• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 9M ago
cake
Cake day: Apr 11, 2024

help-circle
rss

Nope, and now I figure it might as well just wait a little.



Honestly I just read Ubisoft and pass on it. They’ve been too hostile to customers for too long for me to consider.


“Actually this disc is defective. I’d like to exchange it for a new one.”

This trick will be useful if you ever go back to 1999.


I would have enjoyed it a lot more if they had kept making good games!


Who gives more fucks - the man who gives a fuck, or the man who gives a fuck about the giving of fucks?


I’m warning potential readers about the scam you’re promoting. If you don’t care, then stop.

If a cryptocurrency involves trusting a central foundation at any point, it’s a scam. It’s an unnecessary security hole, and one would be damn foolish to invest in it just because the hole remains unused.


That’s whataboutism - a low carbon footprint doesn’t change whether or not Nano is a scam. My Excel spreadsheet has an even lower carbon footprint than the AI you’re pitching here. If they own a large enough majority to control the network, then they can dictate policy or favor their own blocks for free money.


What would be a controlling share with Nano?

51%

The largest representatives according to voting weight were the exchanges last time I checked

Which is irrelevant because holders can just choose different representatives.

So I mean, while I can’t prove that the foundation held more coins than they claimed, I’m unaware that there was ever a sign of them actually doing so.

The sign is them creating a design that expects this tremendous amount of trust. It’s extremely conspicuous to create a vulnerability that only the foundation can exploit, that can go undetected if they don’t make a huge mistake.

It has to come from somewhere, right? How would you fairly distribute coins that aren’t mined?

You can’t fairly distribute a premine. Don’t use coins with premines.

I’m glad you’re not here to shill Nano, but it is a scam and you are promoting it.


https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/premining.asp

You are one of those suckers if you believe every distributed coin was solved by a CAPTCHA. The centralized(!) foundation pinky promises that they didn’t sock puppet ten times as many suckers at launch, and then keep a controlling share of stake permanently.

A better way to do the initial “airdrop” is to not do centralized issuance at all, because anyone would be a complete fool to trust any crypto foundation.


Nano is a scam. They mined all the coins up front, and then told the most gullible rubes in the universe that everyone else had to fill out CAPTCHAs too.


I gotta find one of those godly servers populated by retired architects and engineers.


A million dollars isn’t what it used to be. There are older working class multi-millionaires who have saved that much from entirely their own labor.


What good is job security when we get an automatic pay cut every year? We get raises by switching jobs!




Hopefully it’ll be like Minecraft; that game has gotten way better since Microsoft.



Hazardous information warning

You already have taste buds there anyways


Anthropologists can look at a pile of skeletons and tell if it’s before or after processed sugar.



In the right context it doesn’t necessarily hurt immersion. We’ve come to expect car racing to be filled with ads because car racing initially was an ad.


⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ or else you basically support Xbox


Keep in mind this is purchasing a Sony product after they already showed us who they were with the first rootkit scandal.



Exactly. Nobody would expect Japan to land a man on the moon in 3 months just because they’ve been dominating video games forever.