Because the article is badly written.

It’s confusing money spend on X must equal time spent on X.

The total amount of money spend on video games has gone done but more money is now being spent on things like crypto currency. This is being claimed that it means that people are spending more time on crypto since they are spending more money there. It ignores other issues such as who is spending on what (its countries as a whole, not amlunt on average per user), gaming is more expensive, more games are being made as a live service and are flopping (Highguard anyone?), retro gaming is getting bigger (doesn’t cost a fortune), etc…

Oh, of course. When you get trapped in you confidently wrong BS, you move the goal post.

The whole thread is about supposedly not being able to install beyond the Google Play Store, its literallyin the posts title. Trying to rewrite what “sideloading” is now isn’t helping you’re argument.

You literally pointed out that sideloading will still be available, which is what this is about. It’s not about if developers need to be registered, that’s its own issue with is separate own issue. Blocking sideloading means no more 3rd party stores, which will still be very much allowed even in these ruling.

And when did I say anything about you being any type of user, regular or otherwise? And what does that have to do with anything about this false claim that sideloading will be banned?

Did you reply to the wrong comment? Or are you taking confidently wrong to a whole new level?

It never fails to amuse me how confidently wrong some people can be when they don’t even read what they link to.

Because, you know, if you did read that link, you’d know how wrong you were.

Source for this ban claim?

I know there is a ban on not being able to install unsigned apps, but it won’t limit apps to only Google Play apps.

Please, while the whole situation is BS, adding complete misinformation to the mix isn’t going to help.

That was one hell of a leap in (il)logical thinking…