To be honest their gaming division could have been a lot bigger chunk if NVIDIA wasn’t so greedy with their VRAM, prices and disastrous launch of the 50th series with fake MSRP, very mediocre gains against last gen and even higher prices.
As long as scarcity increases revenues from enterprise customers, they have no incentive to increase the supply of gaming GPUs back to a level that fulfills all demand at a price that doesn’t rip off consumers.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
Oh no! gaming division went from $3.2B to $2.5B while our datacenter division went from $30B to $35B
To be honest their gaming division could have been a lot bigger chunk if NVIDIA wasn’t so greedy with their VRAM, prices and disastrous launch of the 50th series with fake MSRP, very mediocre gains against last gen and even higher prices.
i dont think they care about gaming rn
if only there were two competitors willing to provide entry level and mid grade cards at prices that a normal person can afford.
because right now nvidia is selling their shit to middle aged, high earning cucks imho
As long as scarcity increases revenues from enterprise customers, they have no incentive to increase the supply of gaming GPUs back to a level that fulfills all demand at a price that doesn’t rip off consumers.
the COVID classic… i swear sony was holding back stock to drive scarcity after supply chain issues have been resolved.