I simply don’t understand how Sony studios extract the visuals they achieve in their games from old hardware. It feels like tech sorcery.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
2
edit-2
1Y

How is nearly every answer in this thread wrong?

To answer everyone: haveing a single piece of hardware to develop does help, absolutely. But the answer is simply… money.

Sony pays to have have games like R&C or Uncharted made. These games wouldn’t be profitable for the studio to make, with the level of detail and polish, but they get $60 million (example number, definitely varies) from Sonyand now the studio is in the green.

That’s it’s. Console hardware is more PC than ever, having x86 AMD CPUs that aren’t that different from ones other OEM could just order. These is no secret sauce, they aren’t some crazy in-house developed flop or some weird also-ran processor like PS3 and 360.

all-knight-party
link
fedilink
5
edit-2
1Y

I don’t think they’re necessarily wrong but I’d love a nice ELI5 answer that’s not just “there’s one kind of hardware and the developers try really hard to make it run good”

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
31Y

Also, I thought Ratchet and Clank ran at a solid 60fps.

@[email protected]
link
fedilink
English
11Y

What’s the right answer?

Create a post

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

  • 1 user online
  • 46 users / day
  • 461 users / week
  • 1.95K users / month
  • 6.39K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 4.99K Posts
  • 103K Comments
  • Modlog