For PC gaming news and discussion.
PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
- 1 user online
- 164 users / day
- 457 users / week
- 1.01K users / month
- 2.89K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 6.58K Posts
- 48.7K Comments
- Modlog
What is the reason for this? Laziness?
Nah, this took extra effort to implement.
I think in theory it’s less effort for them because they only need to build the server side engine that the client connects to, instead of also building a local version.
There is no singleplayer. The campaign is co-op. If you’re soloing the campaign, you’re still playing online.
That makes more sense. I can see how it simplifies things. It still seems like a decision that is lazy and disregards the players.
It’s hard to overstate how insanely fast these games get made. I have no doubt that the project managers have to cut any corner they can to meet the release schedule. Don’t take this as a defense of the result, but rather a criticism of the treadmill dev cycle for these games.
Of course. They’re just in it to extract as much profit as possible.