There are way, way too many people who have never heard of Nintendo’s problems and/or don’t care for it to make any difference. They’re culturally relevant, and there’s nothing you or I can do about it.
If you really want to do something, and you’re watching everyone else enjoy it on social media, that takes willpower. You only have so much willpower, so why not use it on something that actually helps someone, like not eating meat or child shave chocolate or whatever?
But you realise you could swap the Nintendo games with child slave chocolate and this discussion would have played out just the same. What makes one boycott more likely to succeed than another? That’s setting aside the fact that you’re assuming everybody will have the same set of social values as you.
Wouldn’t you want to skip Nintendo games so that they stop being culturally relevant? I often hear that piracy is good for media creators in the long run.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc…
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.
Comments.
No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
There are way, way too many people who have never heard of Nintendo’s problems and/or don’t care for it to make any difference. They’re culturally relevant, and there’s nothing you or I can do about it.
This kind of thinking certaintly won’t contribute to that changing.
Abstaining from entertainment to no actual end drains valuable mental energy that could be going into constructive solutions.
That might be true if there weren’t literally a million other games to play instead.
How does not playing a game drain more valuable mental energy than downloading, installing, and playing it?
If you really want to do something, and you’re watching everyone else enjoy it on social media, that takes willpower. You only have so much willpower, so why not use it on something that actually helps someone, like not eating meat or child shave chocolate or whatever?
But you realise you could swap the Nintendo games with child slave chocolate and this discussion would have played out just the same. What makes one boycott more likely to succeed than another? That’s setting aside the fact that you’re assuming everybody will have the same set of social values as you.
We’re taking about pirating the games, not buying them. Not buying them is still voting with your wallet.
This is the message we were replying to
Yes, the one responding to a suggestion to pirate their games, which directly references piracy in the quote you pasted.
Got a better idea, or are you content doing fuck-all about it, too? 🤓
I’ve been vocally boycotting Nintendo for a few years.