This may not be as straightforward as planned. There are plenty of games that have virtual currencies you can gain in game. So short of giving you money they would still need some “wallet”. And that virtual wallet wouldn’t be able to match 1:1 the real wallet value
When in-game digital content or services are offered in exchange
for in-game virtual currency that can be bought (directly or indirectly via another
in-game virtual currency), their price should also be indicated in real-world money.
The price should be indicated based on what the consumer would have to pay in full,
directly or indirectly via another in-game virtual currency, the required amount of in-
game virtual currency, without applying quantity discounts or other promotional offers
Although consumers may acquire in-game virtual currency in different ways and
quantities, for example through gameplay or due to promotional offers, this does
not change the price of the in-game digital content or services itself. The price must
constitute an objective reference for what the real-world monetary cost is, regardless
of how the consumer acquires the means to purchase it.
I would argue this is a remarkable loophole, though. It effectively means they are ordering devs to display a higher price in real money than in virtual currency. Effectively a prompt that goes “this is normally ten bucks, but if you buy it this way you can get it for seven in virtual currency” would be following this recommendation to the letter.
Turns out regulating things this granularly is actually kinda hard. Go figure.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
This may not be as straightforward as planned. There are plenty of games that have virtual currencies you can gain in game. So short of giving you money they would still need some “wallet”. And that virtual wallet wouldn’t be able to match 1:1 the real wallet value
They do address that:
I would argue this is a remarkable loophole, though. It effectively means they are ordering devs to display a higher price in real money than in virtual currency. Effectively a prompt that goes “this is normally ten bucks, but if you buy it this way you can get it for seven in virtual currency” would be following this recommendation to the letter.
Turns out regulating things this granularly is actually kinda hard. Go figure.
Just have the store accept two currencies. “If you want this thing you can either pay 4.99€, or 156000 schmooplebucks”