Eh, not really. They aren’t called star wars 1, star wars 2, star wars 3, etc.
They all have individual names and they are just ordered 1-9 without it being in the title.
Witcher has the number in the actual title (at least the second and third do)
So instead of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt and then releasing The Witcher 4: ???, I just think it may be more logical to release it as The Witcher ??? 1: ??? or something, just so that it is obvious it’s a separate trilogy and storyline.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
If its a new trilogy should they be referring to it as witcher 4?
Wouldn’t it make more sense to call it something like Witcher: ??? 1,2, and 3
I mean, Star Wars is three connected but distinct trilogies numbered 1-9. Same deal?
Eh, not really. They aren’t called star wars 1, star wars 2, star wars 3, etc.
They all have individual names and they are just ordered 1-9 without it being in the title.
Witcher has the number in the actual title (at least the second and third do)
So instead of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt and then releasing The Witcher 4: ???, I just think it may be more logical to release it as The Witcher ??? 1: ??? or something, just so that it is obvious it’s a separate trilogy and storyline.