Microsoft has ‘let Blizzard be Blizzard’ following its acquisition, studio says | VGC
www.videogameschronicle.com
external-link
Microsoft has “let Blizzard be Blizzard,” following the acquisition of the veteran developer according to World of Warcraft’s executive producer.

That’s… not a good thing, right? I mean it usually is, but Blizzard being the toxic cesspool we now know it already was before the merger, wouldn’t it make more sense to just replace the entire c suite with Microsoft people?

I’m on your side. Mainly because I was also really hoping for some sort of revival of Heroes of the Storm :P. Seriously, Blizzard is not the same company I thought I loved growing up.

However, I did watch someone on YouTube that talked about working Gears of War and execs of MS were less than helpful.

I think it’s Laura Fryer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69gs773bZRI

It has been many years ago though. Blzzard and Activision definitely could use a change of leadership in my opinion.

MentalEdge
link
fedilink
209M

Activision*

And also yes. Actiblizz needs fixing, bad. That the acquisition might provoke some changes in that direction was the sole reason to be a little happy about it.

Create a post

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
  • 1 user online
  • 54 users / day
  • 346 users / week
  • 922 users / month
  • 3.08K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 4.59K Posts
  • 30K Comments
  • Modlog