At this point they might as well just call It COD:Forever Warfare, make it a subscribtion service and sign people up for life, because people will just buy every COD.

It’s nice Bethesda wants to pull a Cyberpunk, but Starfield at it’s core just isn’t as good. I’m all for some redeeming updates though, because at least there would be something to come back to

Because Starfield’s problems don’t have an easy fix. Cyberpunk had initial lack of optimization. Starfield lacks in writing and immersion, also some very basic areas like UI and loading-points. It’s a different mess. I enjoyed both games and hope Microsoft keeps their word and invests in the continued improvement of Starfield. I’d love to come back when it’s gotten better.

It’s unlikely Bethesda is gonna replicate what CDPR has done with Cyberpunk and adress all the issues players have had with the game. If they claim support for years to come that would be the template. And just because 12 million people checked out the game, doesn’t mean it has an active playerbase.

just play “black mesa” to enjoy HL1 in HL2 graphics

best explanation so far.

343 execs: make sure all these armors and weapons can’t be used in the campaign / coop.

343 devs: but it’s easy to implement we have the all the assets ready to go.

343 execs: stfu just remove the option.

google just has the worst track record of supporting stuff they introduce.

true, but that doesn’t mean it was cheap.

Usually that means: We didn’t hire enough devs for optimization, didn’t allocate enough time for it and prioritized marketing.

The logical question here is: will COD be in gamepass? otherwise what’s the point of this takeover.

begun the adblock war has