- 0 Posts
- 123 Comments
Can you elaborate where your confusion lies?
Real goods have a limited lifespan, they usually go on sales when they are about to reach the end of their life or when you physically have to get rid of them. Software doesn’t expire.
A price is usually set to cover the initial costs and to make a reasonable profit not to squeeze how much money you can from people.
Yeah, no.
There are multiple comments in the thread that point out the gambling problem including the top comment.
I hate microtransactions of all kinds
With you putting so much effort in defending a company that makes billions off microtransactions and promotes gambling to kids it sounds like you love them.
but Valve is by far nowhere near the worst offender here.
Your comparison should be lemmy and open source platforms not other companies like valve.
CS:2 are both rated M in the US, and 18+ in the EU
Do you really want me to believe there aren’t kids below 18 playing CS in europe? Steam collects your data https://spyware.neocities.org/articles/steam they are fully aware of the actual age of their users and ignore it in the name of profits to allow it’s ceo buy mega yachts.
I don’t encourage anyone to playing around with proprietary software games. Instead there’s plenty of great foss games that you can have fun trying and playing
Okay? I don’t care how much money he has, I only care what kind of person he is and what he does with he resources he has.
He’s the ceo of a company that promotes gambling to kids through a proprietary app and he uses their resources to stroll around in a fleet of mega yachts.
If that’s your idea of a fair reasonable human you are a villain yourself.
Why are you wasting your time defending billionares who are screwing the planet and everyone over? Are you getting paid or are you playing the devil advocate?
There are 800 billionares in USA alone and more than 3000 around the globe. My country italy has about 60 million people and spend 130B on public health each year. The 5.7T you mentioned would be enough to cover the healthcare spending that covers 60M people for 40 years.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/dec/11/megayachts-environment-carbon-emissions-ban
it’s so small that completely eradicating them would do exactly nothing to combat climate change
That’s not true, did you read any of the link posted?
We live in a society made of billions of individuals, we are not ants or robots, everyone is supposed to do is part. Billionare part count as much as millions of people, that’s how big their footprint it.
The yachts they buy, sit in dry dock 99% of their lives. You bitching about it is pure ignorance.
In the articles is it explained how they don’t spend 99% of their live there and how they are polluting even when they are docked, they also get to show you how much of a problem that “1%” cause
You bitching about it is pure ignorance.
I really hope you are rich yourself and own a bunch of boats because otherwise you defending a billionare is as miserable as one can get.
Mega yachts fall into the personal transportation problem. If everyone would go around in a mega yacht we would be long time extinct.
If a single person throw the garbage out of the window it isn’t going to cause much of pollution so why don’t you just throw trash out?
As the ceo of a company with millions of clients many of which are kids you are entitled more than everyone else to show the good example.
What you are saying is simply wrong anyway, mega yachts and billionares are indeed a big cause of pollution.
So we’re at a point that,
We are at a point where if we don’t reduce emissions humanity is doomed. A fleet of private mega yachts is a smack in the face to everyone trying to change for good and so is a smack spending billions on “toys” when the average person is struggling to pay rent.
You seem to have lost track of the plot and of reality, look around yourself there’s a disaster or a tragedy happening every single day.
Valve ceo is thinking about the next project from his mega yachts