I’ll never pay $70 for a game. Still waiting on Dragons Dogma 2 to go on sale. Even if it’s the same with inflation, why would I pay that for an unpolished product that still nickel and dimes me?

Sonic Unleashed was my game. Second only to Sonic Black Knight.

Specs? Settings? I can run the game fine as well if I upscale from 240p.

You had to make the game look as terrible as possible and use fake frames to have an “enjoyable” experience. How is that acceptable? What about that is worth $70?

You should be getting a stable 60fps @ 1440p on medium settings with a 3070ti at the bare minimum. MH is not visually impressive enough to justify how demanding it is. If you think otherwise look at RDR2 performance.

Fromsoft could’ve done this with Armoured Core VI. I think they’re testing the waters with Elden Ring Nightreign.

To give you a real unbiased answer as someone who’s actually used the headset, the Quest 3 is the best VR headset you’ll get for the money. Pancake lenses are amazing, performance is really good, software has gotten ages better since launch. Meta throttles the chipset a lot, with QGO (an app) you can meet or be just under PC quality on most games, but the base headset is fine by itself.

As for games, there’s never been a better time to hope in. But I’ll be honest my Q3 is practically a beat saber machine at this point. I haven’t found another game to be as enticing. Pistol whip was meh, I couldn’t get into B&S or Asgards wrath, Metro Awaking isn’t my type of game. It’s really up to you to decide how valuable VR is.

I couldn’t imagine putting 8 years of effort into a game only for it to bomb. But a least they got their paychecks.

Wow, shocked! If asa releases on Xbox it will be horrid. I quit after 30 hours of dealing with crashes and performance issues. That’s just single player, official servers crash every 1-2 hours and roll back, deleting tames and wiping your inventory.

Yet some still defend wildcard as if they don’t have nearly a decade of experience working on this game. It’s obvious upper management is the issue , but I’m not supporting this crap again.

Unfortunately it isn’t what I wanted out of this game.

Loading screen to land on a planet, loading screen to leave my spaceship, no seamless entry into caves or buildings. Planets and space having boundaries. Can’t use my spaceship to traverse.

Glad people enjoy it, but I was looking for something more akin to NMS or Star Citizen.

No, it’s there. Just depends on what your Internet situation is and where you’re located.

Is that really the best gameplay they could show? Not much happened. Visually it’s extremely outdated.

As long as they’re not trying to charge $60 it’s fine I guess. Edit: So it’s $39.99 ಠಿ⁠ヮ⁠ಠ I’ll have to wait on reviews.

It seems like this game took a lot of “inspiration” from FromSoft’s titles. That’s opening it up to critiques and comparisons to FromSoft’s game design.

Like how the riposte mechanic doesn’t look like it really impacts enemies in the same satisfying way.

Here are a few examples that could support the claim that Republicans have opposed net neutrality regulations:

• In 2017, the Republican-controlled FCC under chairman Ajit Pai repealed the net neutrality rules that had been put in place during the Obama administration. This allowed ISPs more freedom to throttle or prioritize certain content and services.
• Congressional Republicans have generally opposed legislation to restore net neutrality rules. In 2018, the Senate passed a bill to reinstate the rules, but it did not advance in the Republican-controlled House.
• Major broadband providers like Comcast and Verizon have historically donated more to Republican politicians than Democrats. Republicans have received criticisms that these donations sway their positions against net neutrality rules.

Here are some sources that could counter or provide an alternative perspective to the claim that Republicans uniformly oppose net neutrality:

• The conservative advocacy group FreedomWorks supported the 2017 FCC net neutrality repeal under Ajit Pai. However, they opposed a bill in 2012 that they argued would have given the government too much control over the internet. This illustrates more nuanced positions.
• Former Senator John Thune (R-SD) proposed net neutrality legislation in 2015 that attempted to find a middle ground. It would have banned blocking and throttling but avoided heavier utility-style regulations advocated by Democrats. This demonstrated a more moderate Republican approach.
• Polls indicate Republican voters are nearly as supportive of net neutrality protections as Democrats and independents. A 2018 poll by the University of Maryland found 86% of Republicans opposed the FCC repeal. This suggests public opinion within the party is mixed.

As for your last point, you act like any of those dinosaurs know how to.

This shit is the reason I haven’t touched Minecraft in nearly two years.

Goodbye jerboa, I’m sorry…