the court won’t have proceeded with the case if they don’t think the person named in the case has been served,

Fun fact, the case did not proceed they’re specifically asking for it to.

so the fact that he didn’t turn up to court means he must have been served otherwise they wouldn’t have had the trial yet.

No, the date proceeds unless the court says otherwise even if it’s simply to show up and say they don’t have service yet.

Y’all really don’t have any civil court experience do you?

Difficult, yes. Stupid, indeed. How the legal system works? Also true.

A summons still has to be served in civil court meaning actually made aware generally by a hand to hand transfer. There is no mention of that happening and court dates proceed regardless of actual service unless the court moves out preemptively or the other party motions to move it forward to affect service.

So the question is do you know the difference between service and summons and the interplay between them.

Not really, they’re asking for default without actually serving the person and that just isn’t how our justice system works.

That may be but they can still vote and if that’s what gets them activated then go for it. This “right way” shit has got to stop.

That’s what that new pirate MMO was mentally supposed to be

Sorta. They’re pointing out the fact is the default is straight, if you want to scream it at people well that’ll cost you some money.

It’s dumb, super petty and ultimately inane as are most identity politics. I get the point to an extent but anything to either extreme gets a bit grating and irritating.

You used the gun in specials in ff8, it explains it but didn’t really ever show it.

Its useful. I remember playing 1 when I was a kid, no guides just bump around until something works. I also remember asking the older kids in the neighborhood what a Jimmy hat was and one getting in trouble for asking their parents.

Its honestly not a good game and I’ve played all of them since fallout was released. Insisting on a world that requires other players to seem complete is an idiotic idea for a userbase that loves spending thousands of hours by themselves collecting trinkets.

I get the idea and a fair MMORPG would be dank but hard to pull off.

I don’t think they’re at all the same but you’re certainly welcome to your opinion.

As far as I recall there is no dismemberment on crit without flavor text or special weapon on 3+ unless you had bloody mess, on f1-2 is was a lower chance than with the trait but still possible.

But again my point is that its always been gorey more so if you make the correct choices.

Sorta yeah, but critical kill even without the trait would leave and exploded body by chance.

Silly, over the top gore is a core part of Fallout.

That’s what I’m replying to, fallout has always been bloody and explosive gore is just part of the base game no traits.

The perk is a nod to 1 and 2 where people just exploded into a pile.

It’s pretty good.

Sounds right but still.

Original EverQuest is still going and it’s from 91. Now it’s real by iirc a Russian company but same game.

I dunno if it wasn’t usable I just never used it. If I can aim I’m going to aim, I didn’t use it in nv either because they actually made aiming a worthwhile thing to do.

There have been a few versions this one seems smaller then most and likely runs longer.

I dunno if you’re a fan of very bad movies but shaqs “steel” involves a main character who’s in the same sort of chair.

Did you actually get broken into, they said mine never did?