Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc…
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
Beehaw.org gaming
Lemmy.ml gaming
lemmy.ca pcgaming
- 1 user online
- 99 users / day
- 417 users / week
- 1.12K users / month
- 3.95K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 12.5K Posts
- 86.7K Comments
- Modlog
If only there were some regulatory body the government had that could set things right!..right?
Oops! Open your Kinder Surprise to find they’re captured inside.
The government “complains” about megacorps tells you everything you need to know about who sets the rules around here.
Couldn’t have said it better myself. I’m so tired of this system.
It’s not “the government”. It’s one specific agency of the government. The courts are more “the government” than the FTC is, and they’re the ones who approved the acquisitions.
Lol the Microsoft response is just trying to distract the court by saying “hey look at this other stuff we are doing that isn’t anticompetitive”
The FTC has complained about the acquisition literally every step of the way. Not really surprising that they’re complaining about this.
I don’t know why people are down voting you just because they don’t like the government. The FTC legally fought this every step of the way: https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/2210077-microsoftactivision-blizzard-matter
You must be new to Lemmy, but the voting system on Lemmy is even more of a wild west than Reddit’s was/is. I can only guess that is because of the significantly smaller userbase, so biases and other factors are more easily visible through votes. Smaller sample pool makes smaller voices much louder and such.
I’m not new to Lemmy. I was just venting my frustrating against this attitude.
It is a disappointing facet of Lemmy, for sure.
deleted by creator