I’m starting to have a sneaking suspicion that putting 24G of VRAM on a card isn’t happening because they don’t want people using AI models locally. The moment you can expect the modern gamers computer to have that kind of local computing power - is the moment they stop getting to slurp up all of your data.
Honestly I think it is because of DLSS. If you can get a $300 card that could do 4k DLSS performance well, why would you need to buy a xx70(ti) or xx80 card?
Lossless Scaling (on Steam) has also shown HUGE promise from a 2-GPU standpoint as well. I’ve seen some impressive results from people piping their NVidia cards, into an Intel GPU (on-die or discreet) and using a dedicated GPU for the upscaling as well.
It’s because the GTX 10XX gen had much VRAM (yes 1070 had 8GB VRAM in 2016) and was a super good generation that lasted many years. Clearly they want you to change GPUs more often and that’s why they limit the VRAM.
I bought an used RTX 3070 with 8GB VRAM, two and a half years ago, and occasionally i get pissed from my VRAM limits. I don’t know who buys a GPU with 8GB these days…
I bought one new as the planned 3090 and potential backup 3080 were far too expensive, worst card i owned.
The 8gb was enough for about 3 months, when i was still enamored with my backlog of older games.
I now switched teams and got a 24gb gpu. My first gpu was also team red and lasted 11 years until it was incapable of running the games i wanted to play. I hope my current gpu will also last longer.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
I’m starting to have a sneaking suspicion that putting 24G of VRAM on a card isn’t happening because they don’t want people using AI models locally. The moment you can expect the modern gamers computer to have that kind of local computing power - is the moment they stop getting to slurp up all of your data.
Honestly I think it is because of DLSS. If you can get a $300 card that could do 4k DLSS performance well, why would you need to buy a xx70(ti) or xx80 card?
Lossless Scaling (on Steam) has also shown HUGE promise from a 2-GPU standpoint as well. I’ve seen some impressive results from people piping their NVidia cards, into an Intel GPU (on-die or discreet) and using a dedicated GPU for the upscaling as well.
It’s because the GTX 10XX gen had much VRAM (yes 1070 had 8GB VRAM in 2016) and was a super good generation that lasted many years. Clearly they want you to change GPUs more often and that’s why they limit the VRAM.
I bought an used RTX 3070 with 8GB VRAM, two and a half years ago, and occasionally i get pissed from my VRAM limits. I don’t know who buys a GPU with 8GB these days…
I bought one new as the planned 3090 and potential backup 3080 were far too expensive, worst card i owned.
The 8gb was enough for about 3 months, when i was still enamored with my backlog of older games.
I now switched teams and got a 24gb gpu. My first gpu was also team red and lasted 11 years until it was incapable of running the games i wanted to play. I hope my current gpu will also last longer.
Uninformed desperate users unfortunately😔