This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
That’s a bit disingenuous of a headline. They compared a prototype to an inservice production speed. As stated, other prototypes have exceeded 500km/h. Now if this goes into service it’ll hold the record there.
A record in what? It’s far behind the world records.
Maybe maybe not. That TGV was just an engine car.
Up next: not to be left behind, the west invests in creating an even faster train - codenamed “Snowpiercer.”
Ah yes beating the global speed record of 574,8 km/h!
On conventional rail? I think you mean that one TGV example with no cars or passengers just an engine car?
Can it go this fast while in service? Is it practical to do so? Where does this leave Maglev?
Lots of brainworms in this sentence. It is never the purpose of infrastructure projects to turn a profit.
It must be nice to live in a country that is capable of building things other than highways and single-family home suburban developments.
How are they with angles?
They can sometimes be obtuse, but otherwise mostly acute