Well, then I’m either thinking of an older DLSS, or something else entirely.
BBC ran an article with a bit more to it, showing the same Resident Evil image with/without DLSS 5, and it looked more different than I expected it to. So nah, I’m not gonna defend this.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
Well, then I’m either thinking of an older DLSS, or something else entirely.
BBC ran an article with a bit more to it, showing the same Resident Evil image with/without DLSS 5, and it looked more different than I expected it to. So nah, I’m not gonna defend this.
Yeah. Previous generations of DLSS were about achieving the same result with less.
DLSS 5 is about “improving” what was previously the end result, even in cases where DLSS wouldn’t have been needed in the first place.
Nvidia is claiming it achieves “hollywood movie cgi” fidelity.
In practice it looks like the result is just not pleasant.