The thing is, Nvidia doesn’t care. They make way more money from the business sector. More and more businesses don’t care about the average consumer, they care about the consumers with deep pockets.
This is pcgaming not investing. The aspects you are talking about don’t matter to pc gamers who are only trying to get whatever parts they can for a bargain as opposed to concerns about return on investment.
Yeah, but AMD and Nvidia’s consumer GPUs don’t exist in a vacuum. They are companies with entire portfolios of things to sell. I know people are frustrated and maybe it helps them to downvote, but it’s the truth. Nvidia doesn’t give a shit about the consumer market now (neither does Samsung, Crucial, etc…). AMD doesn’t have the leverage to squeeze the market like Nvidia does, hence the price drop referenced in the article while the price of a 5090 is still going up. I don’t know why any gamer would buy Nvidia though. Unless you want to do AI workloads, they’ve priced themselves out of being reasonable. Heck, even for AI, AMD gives more RAM at a lower cost and ROCM continually gets better.
They don’t exist in a vacuum but taking a weird investor approach about how nvidia is far ahead because they chose to invest in AI is not really in line with the comment they responded to saying they picked it up because of Linux support.
Comes off as some weird AI and revenue spokesperson when we aren’t here to discuss which stocks to invest in.
What, the original comment in this thread is about the comment about AI? Nobody in this comment thread said anything about Linux support other than you just now. You’re lost in the thread.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
The thing is, Nvidia doesn’t care. They make way more money from the business sector. More and more businesses don’t care about the average consumer, they care about the consumers with deep pockets.
This is pcgaming not investing. The aspects you are talking about don’t matter to pc gamers who are only trying to get whatever parts they can for a bargain as opposed to concerns about return on investment.
Yeah, but AMD and Nvidia’s consumer GPUs don’t exist in a vacuum. They are companies with entire portfolios of things to sell. I know people are frustrated and maybe it helps them to downvote, but it’s the truth. Nvidia doesn’t give a shit about the consumer market now (neither does Samsung, Crucial, etc…). AMD doesn’t have the leverage to squeeze the market like Nvidia does, hence the price drop referenced in the article while the price of a 5090 is still going up. I don’t know why any gamer would buy Nvidia though. Unless you want to do AI workloads, they’ve priced themselves out of being reasonable. Heck, even for AI, AMD gives more RAM at a lower cost and ROCM continually gets better.
They don’t exist in a vacuum but taking a weird investor approach about how nvidia is far ahead because they chose to invest in AI is not really in line with the comment they responded to saying they picked it up because of Linux support.
Comes off as some weird AI and revenue spokesperson when we aren’t here to discuss which stocks to invest in.
What, the original comment in this thread is about the comment about AI? Nobody in this comment thread said anything about Linux support other than you just now. You’re lost in the thread.
Consumer hardware has always been an R&D recoup for the business sector.