For PC gaming news and discussion.
PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
- 1 user online
- 76 users / day
- 314 users / week
- 853 users / month
- 3.13K users / 6 months
- 1 subscriber
- 4.48K Posts
- 28.8K Comments
- Modlog
Beat me to it. Dwarf Fortress is always my first port of call when people seem to get mixed up with graphics, computing power, and gameplay.
DF:C is really good for it too, will bring a top tier pc to it’s knees with all the heavy math it wants done.
When you say classic, you just mean the non-Steam version, right?
Does the steam version use multi threading? I thought one of the reasons why DF (OG, which I guess is what you mean by DF:C) was so intensive is it only used one core.
Looks like multithreading is still experimental in the current Steam version, and has to be manually turned on in d_init.txt… Which feels weird. I was playing classic right up until the steam EA release, and it feels like New DF doesn’t slog my pc as bad as classic. Same hardware.