How about an over-the-shoulder perspective, for one?
There’s no reason why it can’t have an in-depth CQC system as well.
Voice acting, cutscenes, I feel like you’re not even trying to understand when you reduce the possibility of a remake to just story and graphics.
You should also keep in mind that most people haven’t played MG1 and 2 because they’re so dated. This isn’t due to being unable to play, since they’re available for free on emulators. People haven’t played or beaten them because they weren’t made to the standard of the good Metal Gear Solid games.
I just personally don’t have a problem with things that exploit people’s vanity.
Based, but these are predatory.
For one, we shouldn’t be lowering our standards so that a business can make more money. Whether you accept it or not, these vanity items do make the game more enjoyable for most players. If more of us had higher standards, we’d get the cosmetics without having to pay for a corporation’s nicer campus or an executive’s 9th property.
For two, whenever chance is involved it will always intrinsically prey upon those with gambling problems.
I’d only be interested in remakes of MG1 and 2, maybe ac!d if the stories are actually interesting (and they’re remade like actual Metal Gear Solid games).
Unfortunately, looking at these comments I think I know what konami will do. They’ll remake MGS1 because it will be “hype” and everyone will buy it out of loyalty to their gamer status, but it will essentially hit as hard as the Oblivion “remake.”
Let’s get something new, guys. We don’t have to replay the same damn game over and over and over.
It’s just business.
Might as well cast a wide net with a bunch of indie trash, hoping that something ends up gaining a following for- whatever reason.
It’s cheaper and easier than taking on risk themselves and trying to compete with the big dogs.