I’ll paste a comment that illustrates it better than I could
Imagine this scenario - you’re a corporate with 1000 sites and maybe 5000 networking devices. You have a rolling replacement program for those devices as they become end of life, and as that progresses you reach a point where all of them can work with IPv6. So you switch off IPv4 and work only with IPv6.
Then your corporate acquires another entity, say consisting of 100 sites with 500 devices. All of those devices need checking that they can work on IPv6 and a significant number need replacing at maybe an average of £5000 per device. With IPv4 you can still integrate the legacy kit into your estate without swapping any of it out, with IPv6 only you can’t.
For an end user, a small startup, or similar sure go ahead and use IPv6, but there are significant obstacles for larger estates, which is one reason IPv4 isn’t going anywhere soon.
I’ve always done it on the app, no phone call or chat. But regardless, it’s not like it’s going to happen. I have my cc info (and throwaway cards like privacy.com) in several websites and nothing like this ever happened. All times I’ve requested a refund was due to the service/product not being what was promised, not due to a data leak. The convenience definitely beats the risk.
Previously, you long-pressed on those six digits in the account list to copy to your clipboard.
With last week’s Google Authenticator update, a simple tap is how you copy those codes. (That being said, we’ve noticed that a long-press sometimes still works in version 7.0, but it’s inconsistent and the single tap is clearly the intended behavior.) A single touch is definitely simpler, but users have to adjust to this.
Google Auth and Authy lock you in, consider migrating to Aegis or Ente Auth.
I briefly checked that the other day and it doesn’t seem to be the case. To my knowledge, the GNSS hardware will gather info on all available (supported + reachable) constellations to give the best location estimate.
There are ways to get raw measurements in some devices, but that’d be at the application level so I think it’s not what you’re looking for.
SOT?
Screen on Time?
I have a 4k and a 21:9 1440p display and I’m sure anyone who gives 5 seconds to think about it will agree the bottom panel is a total waste of space past the usual 1920px width - unless you have an absurd amount of widgets there.
So not only I agree with the gaps, but I have my panel centered to approx. a third of the display width and there’s still plenty of space to fit open windows there.
Full width panel is a legacy choice that just doesn’t make much sense with nowadays screens.
yeah, screw that, I only get frustrated and/or angry. And even if I have the patience to eventually I beat it, it’s just not worth it.