Any gaming journalist claiming that after a mere three hours might not be worth his mettle.
But, no - I’m talking about a gut feeling, I suppose. I’ve been doing this job for a long time. Decades, it pains me to admit. And I think my radar is pretty good. I trust those innards of mine.
Indeed he’s got the vibes so hard he plagiarized his own review:
In fact, it’s giving those vibes so thoroughly that eagle-eyed readers might notice that the structure of this preview’s opening - guts, glory, and all - is borrowed wholesale from that 2022 write-up.
Yet at the end he manages to cast doubt to the gut feeling he trusted a couple of alineas back:
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
For anyone else for whom the archive.is link didn’t work: https://www.vg247.com/dragons-dogma-2-may-be-an-all-time-great-preview
Any gaming journalist claiming that after a mere three hours might not be worth his mettle.
Indeed he’s got the vibes so hard he plagiarized his own review:
Yet at the end he manages to cast doubt to the gut feeling he trusted a couple of alineas back:
Yea…
You have been baited for your hard earned clicks!
I took the blow so y’all wouldn’t have to.
Exactly my thoughts.
This reads like a paid “review”. Or an extreme naive reviewer that somehow thinks 3 hours is enough to judge a game as the best ever made.