China is reportedly advancing towards 5nm AI GPUs, as a new report claims that domestic firms are set to tape out new chips.

If China’s already at 5nm, they’re getting close. Smallest in use now is 3nm, I think.

This poses the question, how long until China can achieve its goals without Taiwan and TSMC?

Tenderizer78
link
fedilink
English
-59d

If they do then they will likely invade Taiwan. The threat of America blowing up TSMC to prevent if from falling into China’s hands, and nuking the world economy, is what is stopping China from invading. Once China has it’s own advanced semiconductor industry there will immediately be war.

I always saw it as TSMC potentially being a key reason for China to invade Taiwan so they get their hands on semiconductors, with this being LESS likely now, instead of more, because China no longer needs TSMC and their research.

Tenderizer78
link
fedilink
English
38d

China’s overtures towards Taiwan have nothing to do with semiconductors. They see Taiwan as an inextricable part of their nation.

Because it is. They’ve also made it very clear that they intend to follow a path of peaceful unification and the only reason that hasn’t happened already is because of US meddling and military threats.

Tenderizer78
link
fedilink
English
-18d

I don’t agree with that.

Taiwan hasn’t been part of China since before the CCP came to power. China is doing just fine without Taiwan and Taiwan doesn’t seem to want to join China.

It seems you’re mostly right (except there are rumours that a Taiwan takeover is part of China’s long term plan for economic dominance).

I’m worried at how many China shills there are around here.

Tenderizer78
link
fedilink
English
0
edit-2
7d

I’m a soft China shill myself, I just don’t agree with their intended invasion of Taiwan (among other policies) nor the ethnonationalist-like beliefs underlying it.

Don’t you have that backwards? Without TSMC’s outstanding technology, the island’s value decreases, both for China and for the USA. Conventional wisdom is that reduced tensions also reduces the risk of war.

Tenderizer78
link
fedilink
English
18d

China’s overtures towards Taiwan have nothing to do with semiconductors. They see Taiwan as an inextricable part of their nation.

The only reason I can see for china to invade china 2 is if usa places nukes there

Tenderizer78
link
fedilink
English
18d

China views the unification of the Chinese people as key to it’s prosperity. Just like with Hong Kong and Macau. They’ve also explicitly said they intend to invade Taiwan if peaceful unification is impossible.

So you said the same as me, but framed like a cia stenographer would. Why tho? You gain something from convincing people that china bad?

Tenderizer78
link
fedilink
English
18d

I didn’t say the same as you, and I’m not trying to convince anyone that China’s bad. China views Taiwan as an inextricable part of China.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
creator
link
fedilink
49d

I imagine they will be able to produce bleeding edge chips within a year or two tops. What’s even more interesting though is that China is now producing chips on different substrates like gallium that don’t have any equivalents in the west. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3323448/luo-weiwei-former-nasa-scientist-who-became-chinas-semiconductor-trump-card

Idk about 2 years, but they can definitely do it by 2030.

It took TSMC a while to get to that point if I’m not mistaken, so even with all the financial might of the CCP, I still doubt it will happen THAT quickly.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
creator
link
fedilink
68d

Sure, it’s hard to predict exact timing on these sort of things, so another 5 years is a plausible timeline. It does tend to be easier to do things the second time around. When you’re doing something from scratch then you don’t know what the right approach will be, you’re going to have false starts, and so on. When the general idea has been proven, it’s much easier to replicate because now you know what the general direction to pursue is.

The challenge more is that even if they can produce the chips, the machines they are using they can’t get parts for. EUV is still out of reach. Probably another 5-8 years.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
creator
link
fedilink
28d

It’s kind of funny how you just confidently pull a number out of your ass here. On what basis do you think China is 5-8 years away from making their own EUV machines exactly?

The reality is that China is already starting to experiment with their own EUV approaches. A lot of the complexity in ASML machines comes from the fact that they need to be compact enough to ship around the world. China is looking at the approach of using an accelerator instead.

I’ve been following this story for 5 years. There’s lots of hopey articles like this over that time. SMEE was supposed to release a 28-nm DUV machine last year in 2023, then 2024 summer, then 2024 December. To date no release. Most of these innovations by thr Chinese are academic discoveries that will take years further to productionize. Generally if the Chinese say they will do something new-technology-wise next year, it will happen 2-5 years after when they say it will.

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
creator
link
fedilink
16d

I find that generally we tend to see tech progress in China outpace predictions. For example, nobody expected China to start producing 7 and 5nm chips by now, nobody thought Huawei clusters would be able to compete with Nvidia, etc. Of course, doing new things is always tricky, and 2-5 years certainly sounds plausible to me.

They’re producing these 7 nm and 5 nm chips on ASML machines they bought or smuggled into the country. The problem is they can’t fix them on warranty if they break and they can’t figure out how to reverse engineer them yet. I’m hopefully but I’m realistic.

Create a post

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

  • 1 user online
  • 48 users / day
  • 138 users / week
  • 419 users / month
  • 1.46K users / 6 months
  • 1 subscriber
  • 4.11K Posts
  • 48.6K Comments
  • Modlog