CEO Strauss Zelnick says generative AI remains a tool for enabling creators to do bigger and better things, but it sounds like a shift away from past comments.
I prefer real science, thanks. You know, the kind that gets published in scientific journals and peer-reviewed, where they actually try to provide controls for what they are measuring, rather than going “trust me bro, I tried it and it’s a total game changer”.
You’d think, as a science enjoyer, you’d know better than to conflate the process of testing and forming conclusions based on observation and academia.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
I prefer real science, thanks. You know, the kind that gets published in scientific journals and peer-reviewed, where they actually try to provide controls for what they are measuring, rather than going “trust me bro, I tried it and it’s a total game changer”.
You’d think, as a science enjoyer, you’d know better than to conflate the process of testing and forming conclusions based on observation and academia.
On the other hand, your idea of a scientific process is par for the course for a clankerfucker
I’m sure that joke kills at recess