presumably they have an average number of refunds for users across whatever game…outliers tend to be very obvious with this sort of thing.
that goes for everything, go to any clothing store, restaurant, any business at all really, and I guarantee you 75% of their customer bullshit some karen wasting time wanting a couple $'s back or whatever…it’s always the same people
for most businesses, they’re such a small overall portion of their customerbase it’s not even worth it to tell em to fuck off. they think they’re “beating the system/holding people accountable” or some shit like that but they’re barely even a rounding error on a balance sheet somewhere
The thing is, it would have been so easy to just say what they consider the “abusing” conditions than just leaving it at that. You are going a lot of their whitewashing for them. Sure it could be that, it might probably be that, but is it?
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates.
(Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources.
If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
presumably they have an average number of refunds for users across whatever game…outliers tend to be very obvious with this sort of thing.
that goes for everything, go to any clothing store, restaurant, any business at all really, and I guarantee you 75% of their customer bullshit some karen wasting time wanting a couple $'s back or whatever…it’s always the same people
for most businesses, they’re such a small overall portion of their customerbase it’s not even worth it to tell em to fuck off. they think they’re “beating the system/holding people accountable” or some shit like that but they’re barely even a rounding error on a balance sheet somewhere
So basically, my last sentence.
The thing is, it would have been so easy to just say what they consider the “abusing” conditions than just leaving it at that. You are going a lot of their whitewashing for them. Sure it could be that, it might probably be that, but is it?