I’ll never understand why they tried to make a game that would be instantly compared to GTA. Just set themselves up for failure when they could have tried something different and maybe made something good.
You’re completely right. It sounds from the article like they flailed around a lot trying to figure out what that could be before settling for “do what you know.”
A huge amount of time and energy wasted without a clear vision, and then they fell into the trap of trying to chase the success of other games.
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc…
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.
Comments.
No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
I’ll never understand why they tried to make a game that would be instantly compared to GTA. Just set themselves up for failure when they could have tried something different and maybe made something good.
You’re completely right. It sounds from the article like they flailed around a lot trying to figure out what that could be before settling for “do what you know.”
A huge amount of time and energy wasted without a clear vision, and then they fell into the trap of trying to chase the success of other games.